CEFC
Price
$10.65
Change
+$0.30 (+2.90%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
25.88M
HFBL
Price
$13.72
Change
+$0.12 (+0.88%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
40.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CEFC vs HFBL

Header iconCEFC vs HFBL Comparison
Open Charts CEFC vs HFBLBanner chart's image
Commercial National Financial Corp (MI)
Price$10.65
Change+$0.30 (+2.90%)
Volume$6.46K
Capitalization25.88M
Home Federal Ban
Price$13.72
Change+$0.12 (+0.88%)
Volume$14.54K
Capitalization40.43M
CEFC vs HFBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CEFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HFBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CEFC vs. HFBL commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEFC is a StrongBuy and HFBL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CEFC: $10.65 vs. HFBL: $13.72)
Brand notoriety: CEFC and HFBL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CEFC: 739% vs. HFBL: 348%
Market capitalization -- CEFC: $25.88M vs. HFBL: $40.43M
CEFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $25.88M. HFBL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $40.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CEFC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHFBL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CEFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HFBL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CEFC is a better buy in the long-term than HFBL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CEFC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HFBL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CEFC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HFBL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HFBL is a better buy in the short-term than CEFC.

Price Growth

CEFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.43% price change this week, while HFBL (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFBL($40.4M) has a higher market cap than CEFC($25.9M). HFBL (11.520) and CEFC (11.080) have similar YTD gains . HFBL has more cash in the bank: 7.57M vs. CEFC (6.29M). HFBL has less debt than CEFC: HFBL (15M) vs CEFC (39.8M). HFBL has higher revenues than CEFC: HFBL (22.5M) vs CEFC (11.5M).
CEFCHFBLCEFC / HFBL
Capitalization25.9M40.4M64%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.08011.52096%
P/E RatioN/A8.34-
Revenue11.5M22.5M51%
Total Cash6.29M7.57M83%
Total Debt39.8M15M265%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CEFC vs HFBL: Fundamental Ratings
CEFC
HFBL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4179
SMR RATING
1..100
669
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1416
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a37

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CEFC's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as HFBL (26) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CEFC’s stock grew similarly to HFBL’s over the last 12 months.

CEFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HFBL (79) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CEFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HFBL’s over the last 12 months.

CEFC's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HFBL (69) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CEFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HFBL’s over the last 12 months.

HFBL's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CEFC (50) in the null industry. This means that HFBL’s stock grew similarly to CEFC’s over the last 12 months.

CEFC's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as HFBL (16) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CEFC’s stock grew similarly to HFBL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CEFCHFBL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CEFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HFBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTG28.520.61
+2.19%
MGIC Investment Corp
WHF9.130.10
+1.11%
WhiteHorse Finance
SYK395.283.47
+0.89%
Stryker Corp
PEPG1.220.01
+0.83%
PepGen
SA15.220.06
+0.40%
Seabridge Gold

CEFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CEFC and HFBL have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CEFC and HFBL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CEFC
1D Price
Change %
CEFC100%
+2.90%
HFBL - CEFC
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
NDBKY - CEFC
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
CNBN - CEFC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BAP - CEFC
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
WTBFB - CEFC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HFBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HFBL and KEY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HFBL and KEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HFBL
1D Price
Change %
HFBL100%
+0.88%
KEY - HFBL
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
WSFS - HFBL
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
BANC - HFBL
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
RF - HFBL
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
TFC - HFBL
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
More