Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEFAX vs RNWFX
CEFAX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEFAX vs RNWFX
Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement A
Price$17.21
Change+$1.99 (+13.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets146.64M
American Funds New World R5
Price$99.24
Change+$2.53 (+2.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
CEFAX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEFAX vs. RNWFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEFAX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. CEFAX (147M). CEFAX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEFAX (2.71) vs RNWFX (1.31). CEFAX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEFAX (6 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). CEFAX (1.42) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEFAX: RNWFX (250) vs CEFAX (1000). CEFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 54.14 vs. RNWFX (27.90). CEFAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.16 vs. RNWFX (12.39).
| CEFAX | RNWFX | CEFAX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.62 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.62 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.117 | 6.094 | 199% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 1.31 | 207% |
| Returns for 1 year | 54.14 | 27.90 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.39 | 43.85 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.16 | 12.39 | 356% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 127.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers