Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEFAX vs RNWFX
CEFAX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts CEFAX vs RNWFX
Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement A
Price$15.37
Change-$0.11 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets127.85M
American Funds New World R5
Price$97.86
Change-$1.27 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
CEFAX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEFAX vs. RNWFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEFAX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. CEFAX (128M). CEFAX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: CEFAX (1.17) vs RNWFX (0.95). CEFAX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: CEFAX (6 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). CEFAX (1.42) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). CEFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEFAX: RNWFX (250) vs CEFAX (1000). CEFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.41 vs. RNWFX (21.74). CEFAX return over 5 years is better than : 46.83 vs. RNWFX (26.64).
| CEFAX | RNWFX | CEFAX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.62 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.62 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.119 | 28.307 | 121% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128M | 76.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.95 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.41 | 21.74 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.49 | 50.49 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.83 | 26.64 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 103.29 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers