Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEFAX vs RNWAX
CEFAX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts CEFAX vs RNWAX
Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement A
Price$15.37
Change-$0.11 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets127.85M
American Funds New World R1
Price$92.44
Change-$1.20 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
CEFAX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEFAX vs. RNWAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEFAX is a Buy and RNWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. CEFAX (128M). CEFAX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: CEFAX (1.17) vs RNWAX (0.00). CEFAX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: CEFAX (6 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than CEFAX (1.42). CEFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RNWAX (37.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEFAX: RNWAX (250) vs CEFAX (1000). CEFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.41 vs. RNWAX (20.34). CEFAX return over 5 years is better than : 46.83 vs. RNWAX (21.33).
| CEFAX | RNWAX | CEFAX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.66 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.66 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.119 | 27.176 | 126% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128M | 76.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.41 | 20.34 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.49 | 47.05 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.83 | 21.33 | 220% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.76 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers