Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEFAX vs RNWAX
CEFAX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts CEFAX vs RNWAX
Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement A
Price$15.26
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets126.87M
American Funds New World R1
Price$88.95
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
CEFAX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEFAX vs. RNWAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEFAX is a Buy and RNWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. CEFAX (127M). CEFAX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: CEFAX (1.17) vs RNWAX (0.00). CEFAX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: CEFAX (6 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than CEFAX (1.42). CEFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. RNWAX (37.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEFAX: RNWAX (250) vs CEFAX (1000). CEFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.24 vs. RNWAX (18.60). CEFAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.17 vs. RNWAX (7.55).
| CEFAX | RNWAX | CEFAX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.66 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.66 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.159 | 20.535 | 161% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 127M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.24 | 18.60 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.16 | 40.76 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.17 | 7.55 | 506% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement