Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEFAX vs RNWAX
CEFAX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts CEFAX vs RNWAX
Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement A
Price$17.21
Change+$1.99 (+13.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets146.64M
American Funds New World R1
Price$94.09
Change+$2.64 (+2.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
CEFAX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEFAX vs. RNWAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEFAX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. CEFAX (147M). CEFAX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: CEFAX (2.71) vs RNWAX (0.53). CEFAX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: CEFAX (6 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than CEFAX (1.42). CEFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. RNWAX (46.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEFAX: RNWAX (250) vs CEFAX (1000). CEFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 54.14 vs. RNWAX (26.30). CEFAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.16 vs. RNWAX (7.02).
| CEFAX | RNWAX | CEFAX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.66 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.66 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.117 | 6.005 | 202% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 0.53 | 511% |
| Returns for 1 year | 54.14 | 26.30 | 206% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.39 | 38.84 | 202% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.16 | 7.02 | 629% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers