CEAD
Price
$10.00
Change
+$2.30 (+29.87%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
4.69M
GP
Price
$0.41
Change
-$0.02 (-4.65%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
48.64M
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CEAD vs GP

Header iconCEAD vs GP Comparison
Open Charts CEAD vs GPBanner chart's image
CEA Industries
Price$10.00
Change+$2.30 (+29.87%)
Volume$41.6K
Capitalization4.69M
GreenPower Motor
Price$0.41
Change-$0.02 (-4.65%)
Volume$192.67K
Capitalization48.64M
CEAD vs GP Comparison Chart
Loading...
GP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CEAD vs. GP commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEAD is a StrongBuy and GP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (CEAD: $10.00 vs. GP: $0.41)
Brand notoriety: CEAD and GP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CEAD: 553% vs. GP: 339%
Market capitalization -- CEAD: $4.69M vs. GP: $48.64M
CEAD [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] is valued at $4.69M. GP’s [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] market capitalization is $48.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry ranges from $181.64B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry is $12.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CEAD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CEAD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CEAD is a better buy in the long-term than GP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CEAD (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а +24.16% price change this week, while GP (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was -5.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was -0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

GP is expected to report earnings on Jun 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (-0.27% weekly)

The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GP($48.6M) has a higher market cap than CEAD($4.69M). CEAD YTD gains are higher at: 23.153 vs. GP (-46.996). CEAD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.1M vs. GP (-12.49M). CEAD has more cash in the bank: 13.3M vs. GP (3.96M). CEAD has less debt than GP: CEAD (414K) vs GP (15.9M). GP has higher revenues than CEAD: GP (49.5M) vs CEAD (8.12M).
CEADGPCEAD / GP
Capitalization4.69M48.6M10%
EBITDA-3.1M-12.49M25%
Gain YTD23.153-46.996-49%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue8.12M49.5M16%
Total Cash13.3M3.96M336%
Total Debt414K15.9M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CEAD vs GP: Fundamental Ratings
CEAD
GP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9799
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3891
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CEAD's Valuation (47) in the null industry is in the same range as GP (62). This means that CEAD’s stock grew similarly to GP’s over the last 12 months.

CEAD's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GP (100). This means that CEAD’s stock grew similarly to GP’s over the last 12 months.

CEAD's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as GP (99). This means that CEAD’s stock grew similarly to GP’s over the last 12 months.

CEAD's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GP (91). This means that CEAD’s stock grew somewhat faster than GP’s over the last 12 months.

CEAD's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GP (100). This means that CEAD’s stock grew similarly to GP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ELD27.55-0.13
-0.48%
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Lcl Dbt ETF
AVK11.86-0.07
-0.61%
Advent Convertible and Income Fund
EWW61.06-0.51
-0.83%
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF
OVL46.31-0.64
-1.36%
Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF
DEXC52.97-0.82
-1.52%
Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF

CEAD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CEAD and XOS have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CEAD and XOS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CEAD
1D Price
Change %
CEAD100%
N/A
XOS - CEAD
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.35%
SHKLY - CEAD
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GP - CEAD
10%
Poorly correlated
-5.71%
ASTE - CEAD
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.65%
DE - CEAD
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
More

GP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GP and ALG have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GP and ALG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GP
1D Price
Change %
GP100%
-5.71%
ALG - GP
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
OSK - GP
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
MTW - GP
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.18%
LNN - GP
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
TEX - GP
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.81%
More