It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CDXS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCSLLY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CDXS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSLLY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CDXS (@Biotechnology) experienced а -10.53% price change this week, while CSLLY (@Biotechnology) price change was -3.40% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.23%.
CDXS is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
CDXS | CSLLY | CDXS / CSLLY | |
Capitalization | 304M | 89.8B | 0% |
EBITDA | -30.09M | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 22.623 | -4.334 | -522% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 33.66 | - |
Revenue | 64.4M | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 90.3M | 885M | 10% |
Total Debt | 41.8M | 12.2B | 0% |
CDXS | CSLLY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 47 Fair valued | 2 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 72 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 73 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CSLLY's Valuation (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDXS (47) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that CSLLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDXS’s over the last 12 months.
CSLLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as CDXS (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that CSLLY’s stock grew similarly to CDXS’s over the last 12 months.
CSLLY's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as CDXS (98) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that CSLLY’s stock grew similarly to CDXS’s over the last 12 months.
CDXS's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as CSLLY (59) in the null industry. This means that CDXS’s stock grew similarly to CSLLY’s over the last 12 months.
CSLLY's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as CDXS (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that CSLLY’s stock grew similarly to CDXS’s over the last 12 months.
CDXS | CSLLY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago85% | 1 day ago72% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago60% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago60% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago85% | 1 day ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago60% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago57% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago0% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago64% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 1 day ago52% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDXS has been loosely correlated with DNLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDXS jumps, then DNLI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CDXS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CDXS | 100% | -7.43% | ||
DNLI - CDXS | 51% Loosely correlated | -3.98% | ||
ABCL - CDXS | 46% Loosely correlated | -5.48% | ||
BEAM - CDXS | 45% Loosely correlated | -4.33% | ||
VIR - CDXS | 44% Loosely correlated | -3.79% | ||
NTLA - CDXS | 44% Loosely correlated | -6.15% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CSLLY and ADAP have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSLLY and ADAP's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSLLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CSLLY | 100% | -1.29% | ||
ADAP - CSLLY | 32% Poorly correlated | -23.28% | ||
MLYS - CSLLY | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.25% | ||
CDXS - CSLLY | 31% Poorly correlated | -7.43% | ||
SEER - CSLLY | 30% Poorly correlated | +4.76% | ||
ADPT - CSLLY | 30% Poorly correlated | -4.62% | ||
More |