CDXFF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.01 (-11.11%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
FOUR
Price
$103.52
Change
+$2.26 (+2.23%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
72 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CDXFF vs FOUR

Header iconCDXFF vs FOUR Comparison
Open Charts CDXFF vs FOURBanner chart's image
Cloud DX
Price$0.08
Change-$0.01 (-11.11%)
Volume$16K
CapitalizationN/A
Shift4 Payments
Price$103.52
Change+$2.26 (+2.23%)
Volume$2.44M
CapitalizationN/A
CDXFF vs FOUR Comparison Chart
Loading...
FOUR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDXFF vs. FOUR commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDXFF is a Hold and FOUR is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (CDXFF: $0.08 vs. FOUR: $103.52)
Brand notoriety: CDXFF and FOUR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDXFF: 100% vs. FOUR: 125%
Market capitalization -- CDXFF: $7.67M vs. FOUR: $4.12B
CDXFF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $7.67M. FOUR’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDXFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFOUR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDXFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FOUR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FOUR is a better buy in the long-term than CDXFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOUR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FOUR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CDXFF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FOUR (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

FOUR is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.24% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOUR($4.12B) has a higher market cap than CDXFF($7.68M). FOUR YTD gains are higher at: 39.252 vs. CDXFF (19.488). FOUR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 366M vs. CDXFF (-8.76M). FOUR has more cash in the bank: 455M vs. CDXFF (88.5K). CDXFF has less debt than FOUR: CDXFF (9.41M) vs FOUR (1.78B). FOUR has higher revenues than CDXFF: FOUR (2.57B) vs CDXFF (1.4M).
CDXFFFOURCDXFF / FOUR
Capitalization7.68M4.12B0%
EBITDA-8.76M366M-2%
Gain YTD19.48839.25250%
P/E RatioN/A45.35-
Revenue1.4M2.57B0%
Total Cash88.5K455M0%
Total Debt9.41M1.78B1%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FOUR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FOUR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X97224.730000-531.203100
-0.54%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

CDXFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDXFF has been loosely correlated with ONVVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDXFF jumps, then ONVVF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDXFF
1D Price
Change %
CDXFF100%
N/A
ONVVF - CDXFF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LKRY - CDXFF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPACF - CDXFF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FOUR - CDXFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
DUOL - CDXFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.06%
More

FOUR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOUR has been loosely correlated with PCOR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOUR jumps, then PCOR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOUR
1D Price
Change %
FOUR100%
+2.23%
PCOR - FOUR
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.39%
FLYW - FOUR
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
EEFT - FOUR
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
PTC - FOUR
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
DOCN - FOUR
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
More