It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CDW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMGIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CDW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGIC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CDW (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -4.39% price change this week, while MGIC (@Information Technology Services) price change was -6.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -3.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.64%.
CDW is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
MGIC is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.
The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
CDW | MGIC | CDW / MGIC | |
Capitalization | 22.4B | 791M | 2,832% |
EBITDA | 1.97B | 83.8M | 2,346% |
Gain YTD | -1.412 | 29.836 | -5% |
P/E Ratio | 21.12 | 20.04 | 105% |
Revenue | 21.3B | 569M | 3,743% |
Total Cash | 688M | 105M | 655% |
Total Debt | 5.99B | 82.1M | 7,301% |
CDW | MGIC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 60 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MGIC's Valuation (6) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CDW (14) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MGIC’s stock grew similarly to CDW’s over the last 12 months.
CDW's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MGIC (60) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CDW’s stock grew similarly to MGIC’s over the last 12 months.
CDW's SMR Rating (20) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGIC (57) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CDW’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGIC’s over the last 12 months.
MGIC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CDW (62) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MGIC’s stock grew similarly to CDW’s over the last 12 months.
MGIC's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDW (81) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MGIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDW’s over the last 12 months.
CDW | MGIC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 3 days ago76% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% | 3 days ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | 3 days ago68% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | 3 days ago61% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% | 3 days ago67% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago61% | 3 days ago70% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago63% | 19 days ago71% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago56% | 3 days ago67% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago55% | 3 days ago60% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDW has been loosely correlated with CTSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDW jumps, then CTSH could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that MGIC and NYAX have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGIC and NYAX's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MGIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MGIC | 100% | -3.55% | ||
NYAX - MGIC | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
UIS - MGIC | 29% Poorly correlated | -8.85% | ||
KD - MGIC | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.29% | ||
CTSH - MGIC | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.88% | ||
CDW - MGIC | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.48% | ||
More |