It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CDW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CDW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
CDW (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +3.67% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.69%.
CDW is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.
The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
CDW | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CDW | LOWV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 3 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 3 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 57% | 30 days ago 45% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 4 days ago 87% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EAOM | 30.27 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares ESG Aware 40/60 Mod Allc ETF | |||
| AQLT | 27.54 | -0.31 | -1.12% |
| iShares MSCI Global Quality Factor ETF | |||
| KOCT | 32.63 | -0.50 | -1.52% |
| Innovator US Small Cap Pwr Buff ETF™ Oct | |||
| IWL | 168.16 | -2.84 | -1.66% |
| iShares Russell Top 200 ETF | |||
| WGMI | 41.97 | -5.76 | -12.07% |
| CoinShares Bitcoin Mining ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDW has been loosely correlated with INGM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDW jumps, then INGM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CDW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDW | 100% | -0.43% | ||
| INGM - CDW | 57% Loosely correlated | -3.90% | ||
| FLYW - CDW | 56% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DXC - CDW | 55% Loosely correlated | -3.20% | ||
| ACN - CDW | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| CTSH - CDW | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOWV has been loosely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOWV jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LOWV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOWV | 100% | -0.15% | ||
| KLAC - LOWV | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| TXN - LOWV | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.10% | ||
| EXPGY - LOWV | 49% Loosely correlated | -4.57% | ||
| CDW - LOWV | 44% Loosely correlated | +3.31% | ||
| FIS - LOWV | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
More | ||||