Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDVZX vs RWEBX
CDVZX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts CDVZX vs RWEBX
Columbia Intrinsic Value Institutional
Price$18.21
Change+$0.08 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.61B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.32
Change+$0.27 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.87B
CDVZX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDVZX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDVZX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 206B vs. CDVZX (2.61B). CDVZX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: CDVZX (1.11) vs RWEBX (0.76). CDVZX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: CDVZX (15 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CDVZX (0.72). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. CDVZX (27.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDVZX: RWEBX (250) vs CDVZX (2000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.29 vs. CDVZX (3.02). CDVZX return over 5 years is better than : 49.84 vs. RWEBX (45.88).
| CDVZX | RWEBX | CDVZX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.06 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.06 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.523 | 9.079 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.61B | 206B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.76 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.02 | 3.29 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.84 | 38.78 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.84 | 45.88 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.45 | 73.45 | 67% |