Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDVZX vs RMFCX
CDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CDVZX vs RMFCX
Columbia Intrinsic Value Institutional
Price$18.67
Change-$0.30 (-1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.67B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.57
Change-$0.70 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
CDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDVZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDVZX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. CDVZX (2.67B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CDVZX: RMFCX (1.21) vs CDVZX (1.10). CDVZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CDVZX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CDVZX (0.72). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CDVZX (27.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDVZX: RMFCX (250) vs CDVZX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. CDVZX (5.90). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.90 vs. CDVZX (46.69).
| CDVZX | RMFCX | CDVZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.91 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.91 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.261 | 15.093 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.21 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.90 | 6.67 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.29 | 30.56 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.69 | 54.90 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.20 | 94.04 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers