Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDVZX vs RMFCX
CDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CDVZX vs RMFCX
Columbia Intrinsic Value Institutional
Price$18.06
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.59B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.38
Change-$0.07 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
CDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDVZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDVZX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. CDVZX (2.6B). CDVZX (1.25) and RMFCX (1.24) have matching dividends . CDVZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CDVZX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CDVZX (0.74). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CDVZX (27.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDVZX: RMFCX (250) vs CDVZX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.71 vs. CDVZX (6.41). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.41 vs. CDVZX (49.75).
| CDVZX | RMFCX | CDVZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.91 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.91 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.420 | 11.421 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.6B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 1.24 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.41 | 7.71 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.54 | 32.16 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.75 | 56.41 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.03 | 91.12 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers