Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDVZX vs RMFCX
CDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CDVZX vs RMFCX
Columbia Intrinsic Value Institutional
Price$19.17
Change+$0.15 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.73B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.49
Change+$0.31 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
CDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDVZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDVZX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. CDVZX (2.73B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CDVZX: RMFCX (1.18) vs CDVZX (1.07). CDVZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CDVZX (15 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CDVZX (0.72). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CDVZX (27.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDVZX: RMFCX (250) vs CDVZX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.27 vs. CDVZX (5.68). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.02 vs. CDVZX (41.05).
| CDVZX | RMFCX | CDVZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.91 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.91 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.508 | 15.500 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.73B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.18 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.68 | 6.27 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.36 | 27.68 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.05 | 52.02 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.49 | 90.44 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers