Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDVZX vs RMEBX
CDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CDVZX vs RMEBX
Columbia Intrinsic Value Institutional
Price$18.20
Change+$0.09 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.74B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.71
Change+$0.23 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
CDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDVZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDVZX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. CDVZX (2.74B). CDVZX (1.07) and RMEBX (1.03) have matching dividends . CDVZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CDVZX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CDVZX (0.72). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CDVZX (27.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDVZX: RMEBX (250) vs CDVZX (2000). CDVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.28 vs. RMEBX (7.97). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.21 vs. CDVZX (35.39).
| CDVZX | RMEBX | CDVZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.460 | 9.599 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.74B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.03 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.28 | 7.97 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.70 | 28.41 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.39 | 45.21 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.33 | 90.05 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers