Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDVZX vs RMEBX
CDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CDVZX vs RMEBX
Columbia Large Cap Value Inst
Price$17.68
Change-$0.07 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.54B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.40
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
CDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDVZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDVZX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. CDVZX (2.54B). CDVZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CDVZX (1.29) vs RMEBX (1.11). CDVZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CDVZX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CDVZX (0.74). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CDVZX (17.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDVZX: RMEBX (250) vs CDVZX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.63 vs. CDVZX (5.22). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.85 vs. CDVZX (47.24).
| CDVZX | RMEBX | CDVZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.07 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.933 | 10.612 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.54B | 110B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.11 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.22 | 7.63 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.12 | 22.19 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.24 | 53.85 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.67 | 77.43 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers