Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDVZX vs RMEBX
CDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CDVZX vs RMEBX
Columbia Intrinsic Value Institutional
Price$18.90
Change+$0.58 (+3.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.82B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.49
Change-$1.74 (-2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
CDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDVZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDVZX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. CDVZX (2.82B). RMEBX (1.08) and CDVZX (1.07) have matching dividends . CDVZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CDVZX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CDVZX (0.72). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. CDVZX (27.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDVZX: RMEBX (250) vs CDVZX (2000). CDVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.99 vs. RMEBX (7.30). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.15 vs. CDVZX (35.93).
| CDVZX | RMEBX | CDVZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.07 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.883 | 2.231 | 219% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.82B | 112B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.08 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.99 | 7.30 | 178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.63 | 28.21 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.93 | 43.15 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.78 | 103.95 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers