It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CDTAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWFCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CDTAF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CDTAF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.82% price change this week, while WFCF (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +0.71% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.79%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.52%.
WFCF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-1.20% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
CDTAF | WFCF | CDTAF / WFCF | |
Capitalization | 4.57M | 59.1M | 8% |
EBITDA | -399.64K | 3.45M | -12% |
Gain YTD | -6.169 | -14.426 | 43% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 29.05 | - |
Revenue | 2.69M | 25.4M | 11% |
Total Cash | 73.9K | 2.24M | 3% |
Total Debt | 1.62M | 2.46M | 66% |
CDTAF | WFCF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 60 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 41 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WFCF's Valuation (75) in the null industry is in the same range as CDTAF (84). This means that WFCF’s stock grew similarly to CDTAF’s over the last 12 months.
WFCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDTAF (100). This means that WFCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDTAF’s over the last 12 months.
WFCF's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDTAF (100). This means that WFCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDTAF’s over the last 12 months.
WFCF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as CDTAF (62). This means that WFCF’s stock grew similarly to CDTAF’s over the last 12 months.
WFCF's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDTAF (100). This means that WFCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDTAF’s over the last 12 months.
CDTAF | WFCF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 5 days ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago63% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago77% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago64% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago63% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago82% | 13 days ago70% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago78% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago63% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CDTAF and WFCF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDTAF and WFCF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CDTAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CDTAF | 100% | -0.61% | ||
WFCF - CDTAF | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.52% | ||
SOPH - CDTAF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.62% | ||
CIOXY - CDTAF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CCOEY - CDTAF | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.30% | ||
CINGF - CDTAF | 6% Poorly correlated | -10.00% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that WFCF and GUNGF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WFCF and GUNGF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WFCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
WFCF | 100% | +1.52% | ||
GUNGF - WFCF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CTAS - WFCF | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.28% | ||
PAYS - WFCF | 21% Poorly correlated | -4.83% | ||
CDTAF - WFCF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.61% | ||
TRI - WFCF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.88% | ||
More |