Advertisement
CDPYF vs MAA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDPYF is a Hold and MAA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CDPYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMAA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CDPYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MAA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CDPYF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CDPYF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MAA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CDPYF (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а +6.18% price change this week, while MAA (@Media Conglomerates) price change was +2.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was +0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.52%.
Reported Earning Dates
MAA is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Media Conglomerates (+0.81% weekly)Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
| CDPYF | MAA | CDPYF / MAA | |
| Capitalization | 4.32B | 15.3B | 28% |
| EBITDA | 323M | 1.37B | 24% |
| Gain YTD | -5.039 | -11.994 | 42% |
| P/E Ratio | 100.38 | 27.66 | 363% |
| Revenue | 1.07B | 2.2B | 49% |
| Total Cash | 39.5M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 5.98B | 5.05B | 118% |
CDPYF | MAA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 25 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 74 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 72 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CDPYF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as MAA (25) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that CDPYF’s stock grew similarly to MAA’s over the last 12 months.
MAA's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CDPYF (100) in the null industry. This means that MAA’s stock grew similarly to CDPYF’s over the last 12 months.
MAA's SMR Rating (72) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CDPYF (90) in the null industry. This means that MAA’s stock grew similarly to CDPYF’s over the last 12 months.
MAA's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CDPYF (74) in the null industry. This means that MAA’s stock grew similarly to CDPYF’s over the last 12 months.
CDPYF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAA (72) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that CDPYF’s stock grew significantly faster than MAA’s over the last 12 months.
| CDPYF | MAA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 46% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 23 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 69% | 1 day ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 57% |
Advertisement
CDPYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDPYF has been loosely correlated with RIOCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDPYF jumps, then RIOCF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CDPYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDPYF | 100% | +0.92% | ||
| RIOCF - CDPYF | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.16% | ||
| SPG - CDPYF | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| IRT - CDPYF | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| MAA - CDPYF | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| MAC - CDPYF | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.54% | ||
More | ||||
MAA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAA has been closely correlated with CPT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAA jumps, then CPT could also see price increases.