CDPYF
Price
$32.69
Change
-$0.08 (-0.24%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.49B
CROMF
Price
$11.00
Change
+$0.09 (+0.82%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
1.83B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDPYF vs CROMF

Header iconCDPYF vs CROMF Comparison
Open Charts CDPYF vs CROMFBanner chart's image
Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$32.69
Change-$0.08 (-0.24%)
Volume$14.98K
Capitalization6.49B
Crombie Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$11.00
Change+$0.09 (+0.82%)
Volume$39.67K
Capitalization1.83B
CDPYF vs CROMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CDPYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CROMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDPYF vs. CROMF commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDPYF is a Hold and CROMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CDPYF: $32.69 vs. CROMF: $11.00)
Brand notoriety: CDPYF and CROMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDPYF: 68% vs. CROMF: 113%
Market capitalization -- CDPYF: $6.49B vs. CROMF: $1.83B
CDPYF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $6.49B. CROMF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $1.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDPYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCROMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDPYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CROMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CROMF is a better buy in the long-term than CDPYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDPYF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CROMF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDPYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CROMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CDPYF and CROMF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CDPYF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +3.78% price change this week, while CROMF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.40%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.28% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDPYF($6.49B) has a higher market cap than CROMF($1.83B). CROMF has higher P/E ratio than CDPYF: CROMF (760.57) vs CDPYF (666.67). CROMF YTD gains are higher at: 17.135 vs. CDPYF (10.365). CROMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 264M vs. CDPYF (9.28M). CDPYF has more cash in the bank: 26.6M vs. CROMF (0). CROMF has less debt than CDPYF: CROMF (2.19B) vs CDPYF (7.11B). CDPYF has higher revenues than CROMF: CDPYF (1.02B) vs CROMF (444M).
CDPYFCROMFCDPYF / CROMF
Capitalization6.49B1.83B354%
EBITDA9.28M264M4%
Gain YTD10.36517.13560%
P/E Ratio666.67760.5788%
Revenue1.02B444M230%
Total Cash26.6M0-
Total Debt7.11B2.19B325%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDPYF vs CROMF: Fundamental Ratings
CDPYF
CROMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10073
SMR RATING
1..100
8890
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5249
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDPYF's Valuation (76) in the null industry is in the same range as CROMF (97). This means that CDPYF’s stock grew similarly to CROMF’s over the last 12 months.

CROMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as CDPYF (100). This means that CROMF’s stock grew similarly to CDPYF’s over the last 12 months.

CDPYF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as CROMF (90). This means that CDPYF’s stock grew similarly to CROMF’s over the last 12 months.

CROMF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as CDPYF (52). This means that CROMF’s stock grew similarly to CDPYF’s over the last 12 months.

CROMF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as CDPYF (4). This means that CROMF’s stock grew similarly to CDPYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDPYFCROMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
28%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDPYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CROMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CARZ62.900.95
+1.53%
First Trust S-Network Fut Vhcl&Tech ETF
RSHO40.390.23
+0.57%
Tema American Reshoring ETF
DFAE29.280.14
+0.48%
Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Mkt ETF
NCLO25.030.01
+0.03%
Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF
EIM9.65N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Municipal

CDPYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDPYF has been loosely correlated with RIOCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDPYF jumps, then RIOCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDPYF
1D Price
Change %
CDPYF100%
-0.24%
RIOCF - CDPYF
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
ARESF - CDPYF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
APYRF - CDPYF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HRUFF - CDPYF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CWYUF - CDPYF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
More

CROMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CROMF and GPMT have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CROMF and GPMT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CROMF
1D Price
Change %
CROMF100%
N/A
GPMT - CROMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
EFRTF - CROMF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.29%
BYLOF - CROMF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
CDPYF - CROMF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
CCPPF - CROMF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More