Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDOZX vs RMEBX
CDOZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CDOZX vs RMEBX
Columbia Dividend Opportunity Inst
Price$40.26
Change+$0.20 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.17B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.79
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
CDOZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDOZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDOZX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. CDOZX (2.17B). CDOZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CDOZX (2.80) vs RMEBX (1.12). CDOZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CDOZX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CDOZX (0.82). CDOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDOZX: RMEBX (250) vs CDOZX (2000). RMEBX (11.31) and CDOZX (10.96) have marching annual gain over last year. RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 60.65 vs. CDOZX (50.76).
| CDOZX | RMEBX | CDOZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.07 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.07 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.224 | 9.495 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.17B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 1.12 | 250% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.96 | 11.31 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.51 | 28.70 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.76 | 60.65 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.05 | 77.57 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement