Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDOFX vs NAESX
CDOFX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts CDOFX vs NAESX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend
Price$47.49
Change+$0.21 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets315.92M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$118.17
Change+$0.72 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
CDOFX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDOFX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDOFX is a Buy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. CDOFX (316M). NAESX pays higher dividends than CDOFX: NAESX (1.28) vs CDOFX (1.18). CDOFX was incepted earlier than NAESX: CDOFX (13 years) vs NAESX (65 years). CDOFX (1.15) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). CDOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). CDOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: CDOFX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.46 vs. CDOFX (-2.72). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 66.66 vs. CDOFX (42.75).
| CDOFX | NAESX | CDOFX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.17 | 582% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.17 | 676% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.135 | 2.781 | -5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 316M | 153B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 1.28 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.72 | 8.46 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.74 | 34.15 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.75 | 66.66 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.73 | 114.71 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement