Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDOFX vs FTHFX
CDOFX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CDOFX vs FTHFX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend
Price$48.84
Change-$0.35 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets339.36M
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.54
Change-$0.53 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
CDOFX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDOFX vs. FTHFX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDOFX is a StrongBuy and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. CDOFX (339M). CDOFX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: CDOFX (1.06) vs FTHFX (0.69). CDOFX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CDOFX (13 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). CDOFX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CDOFX (22.00). CDOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: CDOFX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.21 vs. CDOFX (-5.83). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 81.55 vs. CDOFX (24.66).
| CDOFX | FTHFX | CDOFX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.63 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.63 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.671 | 14.641 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339M | 11.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.69 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.83 | 7.21 | -81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.85 | 47.92 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.66 | 81.55 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.34 | 196.61 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers