Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDOFX vs FSSNX
CDOFX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts CDOFX vs FSSNX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend
Price$48.84
Change-$0.35 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets339.36M
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$32.10
Change-$0.49 (-1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.3B
CDOFX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDOFX vs. FSSNX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDOFX is a StrongBuy and FSSNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.3B vs. CDOFX (339M). CDOFX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: CDOFX (1.06) vs FSSNX (0.80). CDOFX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: CDOFX (13 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). CDOFX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). CDOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDOFX: FSSNX (0) vs CDOFX (2500). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.52 vs. CDOFX (-5.83). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 40.09 vs. CDOFX (24.66).
| CDOFX | FSSNX | CDOFX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.03 | 3,960% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.03 | 4,560% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.671 | 16.329 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339M | 29.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.80 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.83 | 8.52 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.85 | 47.54 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.66 | 40.09 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.34 | 125.94 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers