Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDOFX vs FSSNX
CDOFX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts CDOFX vs FSSNX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend
Price$47.49
Change+$0.21 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets315.92M
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.29
Change+$0.11 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
CDOFX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDOFX vs. FSSNX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDOFX is a Buy and FSSNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. CDOFX (316M). CDOFX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: CDOFX (1.18) vs FSSNX (0.92). CDOFX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: CDOFX (13 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). CDOFX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). CDOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDOFX: FSSNX (0) vs CDOFX (2500). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.28 vs. CDOFX (-2.72). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 60.96 vs. CDOFX (42.75).
| CDOFX | FSSNX | CDOFX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.03 | 3,960% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.03 | 4,600% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.135 | 2.204 | -6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 316M | 25.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 0.92 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.72 | 3.28 | -83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.74 | 31.42 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.75 | 60.96 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.73 | 82.15 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement