CDOAF
Price
$5.50
Change
-$6.91 (-55.68%)
Updated
Mar 14 closing price
Capitalization
66.26M
OCG
Price
$5.47
Change
-$0.18 (-3.19%)
Updated
Jul 22, 02:40 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
117.15M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDOAF vs OCG

Header iconCDOAF vs OCG Comparison
Open Charts CDOAF vs OCGBanner chart's image
CDON AB
Price$5.50
Change-$6.91 (-55.68%)
Volume$6K
Capitalization66.26M
Oriental Culture Holding
Price$5.47
Change-$0.18 (-3.19%)
Volume$100
Capitalization117.15M
CDOAF vs OCG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
OCG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDOAF vs. OCG commentary
Jul 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDOAF is a Hold and OCG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 23, 2025
Stock price -- (CDOAF: $5.50 vs. OCG: $5.65)
Brand notoriety: CDOAF and OCG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDOAF: 100% vs. OCG: 12%
Market capitalization -- CDOAF: $66.26M vs. OCG: $117.15M
CDOAF [@Internet Retail] is valued at $66.26M. OCG’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $117.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.43T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $47.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDOAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOCG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDOAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OCG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CDOAF and OCG are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OCG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • OCG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

CDOAF (@Internet Retail) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OCG (@Internet Retail) price change was -5.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +3.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +114.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +115.91%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+3.23% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OCG($117M) has a higher market cap than CDOAF($66.3M). OCG YTD gains are higher at: 359.350 vs. CDOAF (-55.681). CDOAF has more cash in the bank: 76.8M vs. OCG (18.2M).
CDOAFOCGCDOAF / OCG
Capitalization66.3M117M57%
EBITDA-102.7MN/A-
Gain YTD-55.681359.350-15%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue420MN/A-
Total Cash76.8M18.2M422%
Total DebtN/A11.5K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDOAFOCG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OCG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LSFG46.15N/A
N/A
Lifestore Financial Group, Inc.
SILLF0.16N/A
N/A
Sarin Technologies Ltd.
TBLMF18.00N/A
N/A
Tiger Brands Ltd.
GEAGF68.95N/A
N/A
GEA Group AG
BAESY102.71-2.49
-2.37%
BAE Systems PLC

CDOAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CDOAF and GLBE have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDOAF and GLBE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDOAF
1D Price
Change %
CDOAF100%
N/A
GLBE - CDOAF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.69%
TDUP - CDOAF
5%
Poorly correlated
+14.32%
JWEL - CDOAF
2%
Poorly correlated
-12.92%
OCG - CDOAF
1%
Poorly correlated
-4.24%
CPNG - CDOAF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
More