CDOAF
Price
$5.50
Change
-$6.91 (-55.68%)
Updated
Mar 14 closing price
Capitalization
53.56M
LOGC
Price
$7.28
Change
+$0.18 (+2.54%)
Updated
Apr 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
186.83M
Ad is loading...

CDOAF vs LOGC

Header iconCDOAF vs LOGC Comparison
Open Charts CDOAF vs LOGCBanner chart's image
CDON AB
Price$5.50
Change-$6.91 (-55.68%)
Volume$6K
Capitalization53.56M
ContextLogic
Price$7.28
Change+$0.18 (+2.54%)
Volume$4.44K
Capitalization186.83M
CDOAF vs LOGC Comparison Chart
Loading...
LOGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDOAF vs. LOGC commentary
Apr 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDOAF is a Hold and LOGC is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CDOAF: $5.50 vs. LOGC: $7.10)
Brand notoriety: CDOAF and LOGC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDOAF: 160% vs. LOGC: 66%
Market capitalization -- CDOAF: $53.56M vs. LOGC: $186.83M
CDOAF [@Internet Retail] is valued at $53.56M. LOGC’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $186.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $1.98T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $36.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDOAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLOGC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CDOAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LOGC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LOGC is a better buy in the long-term than CDOAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LOGC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LOGC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

CDOAF (@Internet Retail) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LOGC (@Internet Retail) price change was +5.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +4.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +95.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.31%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+4.31% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOGC($187M) has a higher market cap than CDOAF($53.6M). LOGC YTD gains are higher at: 0.996 vs. CDOAF (-55.681). CDOAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -26.9M vs. LOGC (-78M). LOGC (149M) and CDOAF (145M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CDOAF has higher revenues than LOGC: CDOAF (435M) vs LOGC (43M).
CDOAFLOGCCDOAF / LOGC
Capitalization53.6M187M29%
EBITDA-26.9M-78M34%
Gain YTD-55.6810.996-5,592%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue435M43M1,012%
Total Cash145M149M97%
Total DebtN/A0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LOGC: Fundamental Ratings
LOGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
60
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
99
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LOGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LOGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA259.518.77
+3.50%
Tesla
SPY546.6911.27
+2.10%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL208.373.77
+1.84%
Apple
BTC.X93943.800000244.687500
+0.26%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME27.08-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp

CDOAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDOAF has been loosely correlated with LOGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDOAF jumps, then LOGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDOAF
1D Price
Change %
CDOAF100%
N/A
LOGC - CDOAF
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.72%
QVCGB - CDOAF
30%
Poorly correlated
-5.75%
GLBE - CDOAF
6%
Poorly correlated
+4.52%
TDUP - CDOAF
5%
Poorly correlated
+5.10%
JWEL - CDOAF
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.00%
More

LOGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOGC has been loosely correlated with CDOAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOGC jumps, then CDOAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOGC
1D Price
Change %
LOGC100%
+1.72%
CDOAF - LOGC
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LQDT - LOGC
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
GLBE - LOGC
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.52%
AMZN - LOGC
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.29%
EBAY - LOGC
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
More