CDNTF
Price
$195.44
Change
+$8.68 (+4.65%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.84B
CYYHF
Price
$0.27
Change
-$0.01 (-3.57%)
Updated
May 16 closing price
Capitalization
883.73M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDNTF vs CYYHF

Header iconCDNTF vs CYYHF Comparison
Open Charts CDNTF vs CYYHFBanner chart's image
Canadian Tire
Price$195.44
Change+$8.68 (+4.65%)
Volume$1
Capitalization5.84B
China Yongda Automobile Svcs
Price$0.27
Change-$0.01 (-3.57%)
Volume$80K
Capitalization883.73M
CDNTF vs CYYHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CDNTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDNTF vs. CYYHF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNTF is a Hold and CYYHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CDNTF: $195.43 vs. CYYHF: $0.27)
Brand notoriety: CDNTF and CYYHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDNTF: 4% vs. CYYHF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CDNTF: $5.84B vs. CYYHF: $883.73M
CDNTF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $5.84B. CYYHF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $883.73M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDNTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCYYHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDNTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CYYHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CDNTF and CYYHF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDNTF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CDNTF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CDNTF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +4.65% price change this week, while CYYHF (@Specialty Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +3.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+3.21% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDNTF($5.84B) has a higher market cap than CYYHF($884M). CDNTF has higher P/E ratio than CYYHF: CDNTF (65.00) vs CYYHF (4.97). CDNTF YTD gains are higher at: 42.407 vs. CYYHF (0.000). CYYHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.03B vs. CDNTF (1.48B). CYYHF has more cash in the bank: 2.34B vs. CDNTF (464M). CYYHF has less debt than CDNTF: CYYHF (7.01B) vs CDNTF (8.82B). CYYHF has higher revenues than CDNTF: CYYHF (77.9B) vs CDNTF (16.7B).
CDNTFCYYHFCDNTF / CYYHF
Capitalization5.84B884M660%
EBITDA1.48B5.03B29%
Gain YTD42.4070.000-
P/E Ratio65.004.971,309%
Revenue16.7B77.9B21%
Total Cash464M2.34B20%
Total Debt8.82B7.01B126%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDNTF vs CYYHF: Fundamental Ratings
CDNTF
CYYHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78100
SMR RATING
1..100
5543
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4371
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9851
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CYYHF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNTF (21). This means that CYYHF’s stock grew similarly to CDNTF’s over the last 12 months.

CDNTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as CYYHF (100). This means that CDNTF’s stock grew similarly to CYYHF’s over the last 12 months.

CYYHF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNTF (55). This means that CYYHF’s stock grew similarly to CDNTF’s over the last 12 months.

CDNTF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CYYHF (71). This means that CDNTF’s stock grew similarly to CYYHF’s over the last 12 months.

CYYHF's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDNTF (98). This means that CYYHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDNTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDNTFCYYHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
27%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
23%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDNTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CWB82.250.17
+0.21%
SPDR® Blmbg Convert Secs ETF
XPND33.210.07
+0.21%
First Trust Expanded Technology ETF
IGD5.790.01
+0.17%
Voya Global Equity Dividend AND Premium Opportunity Fund
FIRS21.34N/A
N/A
FIRE Funds Wealth Builder ETF
HSUN33.53N/A
N/A
Hartford Sustainable Income ETF

CDNTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CDNTF and MRGO have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDNTF and MRGO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNTF
1D Price
Change %
CDNTF100%
N/A
MRGO - CDNTF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PAHGF - CDNTF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYYHF - CDNTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDNAF - CDNTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
CMEIF - CDNTF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CYYHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CYYHF has been loosely correlated with JBHIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CYYHF jumps, then JBHIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYYHF
1D Price
Change %
CYYHF100%
N/A
JBHIF - CYYHF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TKLF - CYYHF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HLFDY - CYYHF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWTL - CYYHF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FKRAF - CYYHF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More