CDNTF
Price
$137.24
Change
-$16.06 (-10.48%)
Updated
Dec 30 closing price
Capitalization
5.84B
CMEIF
Price
$0.30
Change
+$0.01 (+3.45%)
Updated
Oct 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.47B
Ad is loading...

CDNTF vs CMEIF

Header iconCDNTF vs CMEIF Comparison
Open Charts CDNTF vs CMEIFBanner chart's image
Canadian Tire
Price$137.24
Change-$16.06 (-10.48%)
Volume$19
Capitalization5.84B
China Meidong Auto
Price$0.30
Change+$0.01 (+3.45%)
Volume$25K
Capitalization1.47B
CDNTF vs CMEIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDNTF vs. CMEIF commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNTF is a Hold and CMEIF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (CDNTF: $137.24 vs. CMEIF: $0.30)
Brand notoriety: CDNTF and CMEIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDNTF: 19% vs. CMEIF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CDNTF: $5.84B vs. CMEIF: $1.47B
CDNTF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $5.84B. CMEIF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $1.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $9.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDNTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCMEIF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CDNTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CMEIF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMEIF is a better buy in the long-term than CDNTF.

Price Growth

CDNTF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CMEIF (@Specialty Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+1.91% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDNTF($5.84B) has a higher market cap than CMEIF($1.47B). CDNTF has higher P/E ratio than CMEIF: CDNTF (65.00) vs CMEIF (20.66). CDNTF (0.000) and CMEIF (0.000) have similar YTD gains . CMEIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.62B vs. CDNTF (1.48B). CMEIF has more cash in the bank: 3.5B vs. CDNTF (464M). CMEIF has less debt than CDNTF: CMEIF (5.54B) vs CDNTF (8.82B). CMEIF has higher revenues than CDNTF: CMEIF (24.4B) vs CDNTF (16.7B).
CDNTFCMEIFCDNTF / CMEIF
Capitalization5.84B1.47B397%
EBITDA1.48B1.62B91%
Gain YTD0.0000.000-
P/E Ratio65.0020.66315%
Revenue16.7B24.4B68%
Total Cash464M3.5B13%
Total Debt8.82B5.54B159%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDNTF: Fundamental Ratings
CDNTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
63
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
85
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
89
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA426.5012.68
+3.06%
Tesla
SPY597.585.94
+1.00%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL229.981.72
+0.75%
Apple
GME27.51-0.21
-0.76%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X101089.610000-3318.461000
-3.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

CDNTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CDNTF and MRGO have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDNTF and MRGO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNTF
1D Price
Change %
CDNTF100%
N/A
MRGO - CDNTF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PAHGF - CDNTF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYYHF - CDNTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDNAF - CDNTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
CMEIF - CDNTF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CMEIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMEIF and CZASF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMEIF and CZASF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMEIF
1D Price
Change %
CMEIF100%
N/A
CZASF - CMEIF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNSO - CMEIF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.57%
BWMX - CMEIF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-3.04%
CYYHF - CMEIF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDNTF - CMEIF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More