CDNS
Price
$317.76
Change
+$0.83 (+0.26%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
86.49B
53 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SAPGF
Price
$245.00
Change
-$0.65 (-0.26%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
285.29B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDNS vs SAPGF

Header iconCDNS vs SAPGF Comparison
Open Charts CDNS vs SAPGFBanner chart's image
Cadence Design Systems
Price$317.76
Change+$0.83 (+0.26%)
Volume$359.86K
Capitalization86.49B
SAP SE
Price$245.00
Change-$0.65 (-0.26%)
Volume$1.28K
Capitalization285.29B
CDNS vs SAPGF Comparison Chart in %
CDNS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SAPGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDNS vs. SAPGF commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNS is a Hold and SAPGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CDNS: $317.76 vs. SAPGF: $245.00)
Brand notoriety: CDNS and SAPGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDNS: 20% vs. SAPGF: 3%
Market capitalization -- CDNS: $86.49B vs. SAPGF: $285.29B
CDNS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $86.49B. SAPGF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $285.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $285.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDNS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAPGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CDNS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SAPGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDNS is a better buy in the long-term than SAPGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDNS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAPGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDNS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
  • SAPGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAPGF is a better buy in the short-term than CDNS.

Price Growth

CDNS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.51% price change this week, while SAPGF (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +50.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

CDNS is expected to report earnings on Feb 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.39% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAPGF($285B) has a higher market cap than CDNS($86.5B). CDNS has higher P/E ratio than SAPGF: CDNS (81.90) vs SAPGF (34.45). CDNS YTD gains are higher at: 5.758 vs. SAPGF (1.313). SAPGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.4B vs. CDNS (1.8B). SAPGF has more cash in the bank: 9.93B vs. CDNS (2.75B). CDNS has less debt than SAPGF: CDNS (2.48B) vs SAPGF (9.12B). SAPGF has higher revenues than CDNS: SAPGF (36.5B) vs CDNS (5.21B).
CDNSSAPGFCDNS / SAPGF
Capitalization86.5B285B30%
EBITDA1.8B12.4B15%
Gain YTD5.7581.313439%
P/E Ratio81.9034.45238%
Revenue5.21B36.5B14%
Total Cash2.75B9.93B28%
Total Debt2.48B9.12B27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDNS vs SAPGF: Fundamental Ratings
CDNS
SAPGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7568
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2028
SMR RATING
1..100
4251
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5560
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4898
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAPGF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDNS (86) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that SAPGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDNS’s over the last 12 months.

CDNS's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as SAPGF (28) in the null industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew similarly to SAPGF’s over the last 12 months.

CDNS's SMR Rating (42) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as SAPGF (51) in the null industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew similarly to SAPGF’s over the last 12 months.

CDNS's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as SAPGF (60) in the null industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew similarly to SAPGF’s over the last 12 months.

CDNS's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAPGF (98) in the null industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAPGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDNSSAPGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDNS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SAPGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLOF53.270.19
+0.36%
iShares Global Equity Factor ETF
HDV122.020.42
+0.35%
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
ETJ8.810.03
+0.34%
Eaton Vance Risk - Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund
MUSQ27.90N/A
N/A
MUSQ Global Music Industry Idx ETF
XBTY11.17N/A
-0.02%
GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF

CDNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNS has been closely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDNS jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNS
1D Price
Change %
CDNS100%
+0.26%
SNPS - CDNS
84%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
S - CDNS
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
MSFT - CDNS
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
ORCL - CDNS
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
CRWD - CDNS
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
More

SAPGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAPGF has been closely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAPGF jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAPGF
1D Price
Change %
SAPGF100%
-0.27%
SAP - SAPGF
75%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
MDB - SAPGF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
MSFT - SAPGF
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
PDFS - SAPGF
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
CDNS - SAPGF
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
More