CDNS
Price
$349.88
Change
+$0.96 (+0.28%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
95.34B
71 days until earnings call
S
Price
$16.80
Change
+$0.23 (+1.39%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
5.59B
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDNS vs S

Header iconCDNS vs S Comparison
Open Charts CDNS vs SBanner chart's image
Cadence Design Systems
Price$349.88
Change+$0.96 (+0.28%)
Volume$1.57M
Capitalization95.34B
SentinelOne
Price$16.80
Change+$0.23 (+1.39%)
Volume$3.75M
Capitalization5.59B
CDNS vs S Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CDNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDNS vs. S commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNS is a Hold and S is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CDNS: $349.88 vs. S: $16.80)
Brand notoriety: CDNS: Not notable vs. S: Notable
CDNS represents the Packaged Software, while S is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDNS: 89% vs. S: 55%
Market capitalization -- CDNS: $95.34B vs. S: $5.59B
CDNS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $95.34B. S’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $5.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $324.27B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.87T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.94B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDNS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDNS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • S’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDNS is a better buy in the long-term than S.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDNS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while S’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDNS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • S’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, S is a better buy in the short-term than CDNS.

Price Growth

CDNS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.62% price change this week, while S (@Computer Communications) price change was +4.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.86%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

CDNS is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

S is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.20% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (+2.18% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDNS($95.3B) has a higher market cap than S($5.59B). CDNS YTD gains are higher at: 16.448 vs. S (-24.324). CDNS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.74B vs. S (-240.23M). CDNS has more cash in the bank: 2.82B vs. S (767M). S has less debt than CDNS: S (12.6M) vs CDNS (2.48B). CDNS has higher revenues than S: CDNS (5.09B) vs S (864M).
CDNSSCDNS / S
Capitalization95.3B5.59B1,706%
EBITDA1.74B-240.23M-723%
Gain YTD16.448-24.324-68%
P/E Ratio94.56N/A-
Revenue5.09B864M589%
Total Cash2.82B767M368%
Total Debt2.48B12.6M19,667%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDNS vs S: Fundamental Ratings
CDNS
S
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7973
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1384
SMR RATING
1..100
4296
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1883
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
241
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

S's Valuation (78) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CDNS (86) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to CDNS’s over the last 12 months.

CDNS's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for S (84) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew significantly faster than S’s over the last 12 months.

CDNS's SMR Rating (42) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for S (96) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than S’s over the last 12 months.

CDNS's Price Growth Rating (18) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for S (83) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than S’s over the last 12 months.

S's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CDNS (24) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to CDNS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDNSS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STRK.X0.1375850.005710
+4.33%
Starknet cryptocurrency
MZZ8.820.11
+1.29%
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
FMED24.260.22
+0.90%
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF
MUE9.550.04
+0.43%
Blackrock Muniholdings Quality Fund II
HTD24.35-0.11
-0.45%
John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund

CDNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNS has been closely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDNS jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNS
1D Price
Change %
CDNS100%
+0.28%
SNPS - CDNS
88%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
MSFT - CDNS
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
CVLT - CDNS
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
ORCL - CDNS
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
S - CDNS
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.39%
More

S and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, S has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if S jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To S
1D Price
Change %
S100%
+1.39%
HUBS - S
67%
Closely correlated
+2.20%
SNPS - S
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
CRM - S
63%
Loosely correlated
+3.89%
CRWD - S
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
NET - S
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.83%
More