CDNS vs S
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNS is a Hold and S is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CDNS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CDNS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- S’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CDNS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while S’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CDNS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- S’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CDNS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.45% price change this week, while S (@Packaged Software) price change was -6.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +28.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.57%.
Reported Earning Dates
CDNS is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.
S is expected to report earnings on May 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+28.69% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CDNS | S | CDNS / S | |
| Capitalization | 85.1B | 7.13B | 1,193% |
| EBITDA | 1.46B | -292.71M | -500% |
| Gain YTD | -16.275 | -27.162 | 60% |
| P/E Ratio | 81.70 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 4.09B | 621M | 659% |
| Total Cash | 1.14B | 926M | 123% |
| Total Debt | 764M | 22.9M | 3,336% |
CDNS | S | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 83 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
S's Valuation (73) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CDNS (83) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to CDNS’s over the last 12 months.
CDNS's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for S (80) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew significantly faster than S’s over the last 12 months.
CDNS's SMR Rating (38) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for S (94) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than S’s over the last 12 months.
CDNS's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as S (83) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew similarly to S’s over the last 12 months.
S's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDNS (59) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that S’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDNS’s over the last 12 months.
| CDNS | S | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 59% | 7 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 65% | 7 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 77% | 7 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 74% | 7 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 75% | 30 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 56% | 7 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 55% | 7 days ago 79% |
CDNS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNS has been closely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDNS jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CDNS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDNS | 100% | -3.33% | ||
| SNPS - CDNS | 88% Closely correlated | -2.65% | ||
| ANSS - CDNS | 77% Closely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| PDFS - CDNS | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| CVLT - CDNS | 60% Loosely correlated | -4.47% | ||
| ORCL - CDNS | 59% Loosely correlated | -4.51% | ||
More | ||||
S and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, S has been loosely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if S jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.