CDNS
Price
$296.95
Change
+$0.66 (+0.22%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
85.08B
51 days until earnings call
S
Price
$18.36
Change
+$0.24 (+1.32%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
7.13B
81 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDNS vs S

Header iconCDNS vs S Comparison
Open Charts CDNS vs SBanner chart's image
Cadence Design Systems
Price$296.95
Change+$0.66 (+0.22%)
Volume$1.37M
Capitalization85.08B
SentinelOne
Price$18.36
Change+$0.24 (+1.32%)
Volume$7.09M
Capitalization7.13B
CDNS vs S Comparison Chart
Loading...
CDNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDNS vs. S commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNS is a StrongBuy and S is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CDNS: $288.61 vs. S: $19.67)
Brand notoriety: CDNS: Not notable vs. S: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDNS: 325% vs. S: 246%
Market capitalization -- CDNS: $85.08B vs. S: $7.13B
CDNS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $85.08B. S’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $7.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDNS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDNS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • S’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDNS is a better buy in the long-term than S.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDNS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while S’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDNS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • S’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CDNS is a better buy in the short-term than S.

Price Growth

CDNS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -9.11% price change this week, while S (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

CDNS is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

S is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.13% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDNS($85.1B) has a higher market cap than S($7.13B). CDNS YTD gains are higher at: -3.944 vs. S (-11.396). CDNS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.46B vs. S (-292.71M). CDNS has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. S (926M). S has less debt than CDNS: S (22.9M) vs CDNS (764M). CDNS has higher revenues than S: CDNS (4.09B) vs S (621M).
CDNSSCDNS / S
Capitalization85.1B7.13B1,193%
EBITDA1.46B-292.71M-500%
Gain YTD-3.944-11.39635%
P/E Ratio81.70N/A-
Revenue4.09B621M659%
Total Cash1.14B926M123%
Total Debt764M22.9M3,336%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDNS vs S: Fundamental Ratings
CDNS
S
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6712
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1578
SMR RATING
1..100
3894
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1459
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
591
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

S's Valuation (68) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CDNS (83) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to CDNS’s over the last 12 months.

CDNS's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for S (78) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than S’s over the last 12 months.

CDNS's SMR Rating (38) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for S (94) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than S’s over the last 12 months.

CDNS's Price Growth Rating (14) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for S (59) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than S’s over the last 12 months.

S's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDNS (59) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that S’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDNS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDNSS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

CDNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNS has been closely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDNS jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNS
1D Price
Change %
CDNS100%
-10.67%
SNPS - CDNS
89%
Closely correlated
-9.64%
ANSS - CDNS
77%
Closely correlated
-5.26%
CVLT - CDNS
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
ORCL - CDNS
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
PDFS - CDNS
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.92%
More

S and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, S has been loosely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if S jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To S
1D Price
Change %
S100%
-2.04%
SNPS - S
65%
Loosely correlated
-9.64%
DDOG - S
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.11%
ANSS - S
59%
Loosely correlated
-5.26%
NET - S
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
CDNS - S
57%
Loosely correlated
-10.67%
More