CDNS
Price
$320.58
Change
+$7.41 (+2.37%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
85.25B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RBBN
Price
$2.81
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
496.24M
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDNS vs RBBN

Header iconCDNS vs RBBN Comparison
Open Charts CDNS vs RBBNBanner chart's image
Cadence Design Systems
Price$320.58
Change+$7.41 (+2.37%)
Volume$33.81K
Capitalization85.25B
Ribbon Communications
Price$2.81
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.53K
Capitalization496.24M
CDNS vs RBBN Comparison Chart in %
CDNS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RBBN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDNS vs. RBBN commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNS is a Hold and RBBN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (CDNS: $313.17 vs. RBBN: $2.81)
Brand notoriety: CDNS and RBBN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDNS: 125% vs. RBBN: 100%
Market capitalization -- CDNS: $85.25B vs. RBBN: $496.24M
CDNS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $85.25B. RBBN’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $496.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $289.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDNS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRBBN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CDNS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RBBN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDNS is a better buy in the long-term than RBBN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDNS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBBN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDNS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 8 bearish.
  • RBBN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RBBN is a better buy in the short-term than CDNS.

Price Growth

CDNS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -2.30% price change this week, while RBBN (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +68.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

CDNS is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.

RBBN is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.14% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDNS($85.2B) has a higher market cap than RBBN($496M). CDNS YTD gains are higher at: 0.189 vs. RBBN (-2.431). CDNS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.8B vs. RBBN (70.3M). CDNS has more cash in the bank: 2.75B vs. RBBN (74.8M). RBBN has less debt than CDNS: RBBN (408M) vs CDNS (2.48B). CDNS has higher revenues than RBBN: CDNS (5.21B) vs RBBN (869M).
CDNSRBBNCDNS / RBBN
Capitalization85.2B496M17,177%
EBITDA1.8B70.3M2,563%
Gain YTD0.189-2.431-8%
P/E Ratio80.71N/A-
Revenue5.21B869M600%
Total Cash2.75B74.8M3,680%
Total Debt2.48B408M608%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDNS vs RBBN: Fundamental Ratings
CDNS
RBBN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5656
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23100
SMR RATING
1..100
4295
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5582
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4793
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RBBN's Valuation (48) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDNS (86) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that RBBN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDNS’s over the last 12 months.

CDNS's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for RBBN (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew significantly faster than RBBN’s over the last 12 months.

CDNS's SMR Rating (42) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBBN (95) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBBN’s over the last 12 months.

CDNS's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as RBBN (82) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew similarly to RBBN’s over the last 12 months.

CDNS's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBBN (93) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBBN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDNSRBBN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDNS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RBBN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSCH45.000.40
+0.90%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF
DWM70.760.19
+0.28%
WisdomTree International Equity ETF
TLTI46.410.03
+0.06%
NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Yr Trsy Bd ETF
PAVE50.69-0.05
-0.10%
Global X US Infrastructure Dev ETF
JUNT36.52-0.06
-0.15%
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer10 Jun ETF

CDNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNS has been closely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDNS jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNS
1D Price
Change %
CDNS100%
-3.06%
SNPS - CDNS
84%
Closely correlated
-1.26%
S - CDNS
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.87%
MSFT - CDNS
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.40%
ORCL - CDNS
58%
Loosely correlated
-4.29%
CRWD - CDNS
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.56%
More

RBBN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBBN has been loosely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RBBN jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBBN
1D Price
Change %
RBBN100%
-2.77%
SHOP - RBBN
56%
Loosely correlated
-5.93%
DBD - RBBN
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
CCRD - RBBN
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
QTWO - RBBN
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
CDNS - RBBN
43%
Loosely correlated
-3.06%
More