Advertisement
CDNS vs RBBN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNS is a StrongBuy and RBBN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CDNS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRBBN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CDNS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RBBN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CDNS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBBN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CDNS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- RBBN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CDNS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -2.61% price change this week, while RBBN (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.80% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.04%.
Reported Earning Dates
CDNS is expected to report earnings on Feb 16, 2026.
RBBN is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.05% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CDNS | RBBN | CDNS / RBBN | |
| Capitalization | 86B | 537M | 16,015% |
| EBITDA | 1.74B | 68.4M | 2,539% |
| Gain YTD | 5.019 | -22.115 | -23% |
| P/E Ratio | 81.44 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 5.09B | 863M | 590% |
| Total Cash | 2.82B | 60.4M | 4,674% |
| Total Debt | 2.48B | 409M | 606% |
CDNS | RBBN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 47 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 82 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RBBN's Valuation (47) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDNS (85) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that RBBN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDNS’s over the last 12 months.
CDNS's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for RBBN (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew significantly faster than RBBN’s over the last 12 months.
CDNS's SMR Rating (42) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBBN (93) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBBN’s over the last 12 months.
CDNS's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as RBBN (82) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew similarly to RBBN’s over the last 12 months.
CDNS's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBBN (91) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBBN’s over the last 12 months.
| CDNS | RBBN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 24 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 22 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 75% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SCZ | 76.90 | 0.41 | +0.54% |
| iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | |||
| IIGD | 24.87 | -0.01 | -0.05% |
| Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF | |||
| FLUD | 25.02 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF | |||
| AVRE | 44.53 | -0.28 | -0.64% |
| Avantis Real Estate ETF | |||
| BITY | 46.79 | -0.64 | -1.34% |
| Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Opt Inc ETF | |||
CDNS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNS has been closely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDNS jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CDNS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDNS | 100% | -0.93% | ||
| SNPS - CDNS | 84% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| S - CDNS | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| MSFT - CDNS | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| ORCL - CDNS | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.88% | ||
| CRWD - CDNS | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.95% | ||
More | ||||
RBBN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBBN has been loosely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RBBN jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RBBN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBBN | 100% | +1.89% | ||
| SHOP - RBBN | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| INTA - RBBN | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| ONTF - RBBN | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| PCOR - RBBN | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| CDNS - RBBN | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
More | ||||