CDNS
Price
$325.56
Change
+$12.40 (+3.96%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:17 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
85.25B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LIF
Price
$58.76
Change
-$0.87 (-1.46%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:46 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.68B
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDNS vs LIF

Header iconCDNS vs LIF Comparison
Open Charts CDNS vs LIFBanner chart's image
Cadence Design Systems
Price$325.56
Change+$12.40 (+3.96%)
Volume$1.37K
Capitalization85.25B
Life360 Inc Common Stock
Price$58.76
Change-$0.87 (-1.46%)
Volume$100
Capitalization4.68B
CDNS vs LIF Comparison Chart in %
CDNS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDNS vs. LIF commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNS is a Hold and LIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CDNS: $313.17 vs. LIF: $59.63)
Brand notoriety: CDNS and LIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDNS: 125% vs. LIF: 71%
Market capitalization -- CDNS: $85.25B vs. LIF: $4.68B
CDNS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $85.25B. LIF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $289.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDNS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CDNS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDNS is a better buy in the long-term than LIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDNS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDNS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 8 bearish.
  • LIF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LIF is a better buy in the short-term than CDNS.

Price Growth

CDNS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -2.30% price change this week, while LIF (@Packaged Software) price change was -8.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +69.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

CDNS is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.

LIF is expected to report earnings on Mar 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.73% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDNS($85.2B) has a higher market cap than LIF($4.68B). LIF has higher P/E ratio than CDNS: LIF (161.16) vs CDNS (80.71). CDNS YTD gains are higher at: 0.189 vs. LIF (-7.031). CDNS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.8B vs. LIF (28.5M). CDNS has more cash in the bank: 2.75B vs. LIF (456M). LIF has less debt than CDNS: LIF (310M) vs CDNS (2.48B). CDNS has higher revenues than LIF: CDNS (5.21B) vs LIF (459M).
CDNSLIFCDNS / LIF
Capitalization85.2B4.68B1,822%
EBITDA1.8B28.5M6,323%
Gain YTD0.189-7.031-3%
P/E Ratio80.71161.1650%
Revenue5.21B459M1,136%
Total Cash2.75B456M604%
Total Debt2.48B310M800%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDNS: Fundamental Ratings
CDNS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
56
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23
SMR RATING
1..100
42
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDNSLIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDNS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LIF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSIHX22.590.22
+0.98%
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps A
HIMVX28.810.14
+0.49%
Harbor Mid Cap Value Investor
LMCQX33.990.06
+0.18%
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R2
SCRLX82.71-0.52
-0.62%
Touchstone Large Cap Focused Instl
ALGZX21.28-0.33
-1.53%
Alger Responsible Investing Z

CDNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNS has been closely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDNS jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNS
1D Price
Change %
CDNS100%
-3.06%
SNPS - CDNS
84%
Closely correlated
-1.26%
S - CDNS
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.87%
MSFT - CDNS
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.40%
ORCL - CDNS
58%
Loosely correlated
-4.29%
CRWD - CDNS
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.56%
More

LIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIF has been loosely correlated with AEYE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIF jumps, then AEYE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIF
1D Price
Change %
LIF100%
-4.05%
AEYE - LIF
48%
Loosely correlated
-4.30%
CDNS - LIF
44%
Loosely correlated
-3.06%
SHOP - LIF
44%
Loosely correlated
-5.93%
UBER - LIF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
CRNC - LIF
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.75%
More