CDNMF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
SRBIF
Price
$1.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

CDNMF vs SRBIF

Header iconCDNMF vs SRBIF Comparison
Open Charts CDNMF vs SRBIFBanner chart's image
EGR EXPL
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$33.33K
CapitalizationN/A
Serabi Gold
Price$1.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.7K
CapitalizationN/A
CDNMF vs SRBIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDNMF vs. SRBIF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNMF is a Hold and SRBIF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (CDNMF: $0.03 vs. SRBIF: $1.05)
Brand notoriety: CDNMF and SRBIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDNMF: 100% vs. SRBIF: 40%
Market capitalization -- CDNMF: $1.03M vs. SRBIF: $25.31M
CDNMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.03M. SRBIF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $25.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDNMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSRBIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CDNMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SRBIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDNMF is a better buy in the long-term than SRBIF.

Price Growth

CDNMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SRBIF (@Precious Metals) price change was -11.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

SRBIF is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-4.57% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SRBIF($25.3M) has a higher market cap than CDNMF($1.03M). SRBIF YTD gains are higher at: 103.173 vs. CDNMF (-6.667). SRBIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.3M vs. CDNMF (-581.5K). SRBIF has more cash in the bank: 13.9M vs. CDNMF (510K). CDNMF has less debt than SRBIF: CDNMF (100K) vs SRBIF (12M). SRBIF has higher revenues than CDNMF: SRBIF (59.3M) vs CDNMF (0).
CDNMFSRBIFCDNMF / SRBIF
Capitalization1.03M25.3M4%
EBITDA-581.5K9.3M-6%
Gain YTD-6.667103.173-6%
P/E RatioN/A16.64-
Revenue059.3M-
Total Cash510K13.9M4%
Total Debt100K12M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SRBIF: Fundamental Ratings
SRBIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
87
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
74
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

CDNMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNMF has been closely correlated with ENDMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDNMF jumps, then ENDMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNMF
1D Price
Change %
CDNMF100%
N/A
ENDMF - CDNMF
69%
Closely correlated
N/A
SRBIF - CDNMF
48%
Loosely correlated
-10.26%
GMDMF - CDNMF
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TRGGF - CDNMF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BHLL - CDNMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
More

SRBIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SRBIF has been loosely correlated with CDNMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SRBIF jumps, then CDNMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRBIF
1D Price
Change %
SRBIF100%
-10.26%
CDNMF - SRBIF
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GMDMF - SRBIF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZIJMY - SRBIF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.69%
GNSMF - SRBIF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLBKF - SRBIF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More