CDNAF
Price
$133.41
Change
+$0.24 (+0.18%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
8B
LEFUF
Price
$20.49
Change
+$0.11 (+0.54%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.14B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDNAF vs LEFUF

Header iconCDNAF vs LEFUF Comparison
Open Charts CDNAF vs LEFUFBanner chart's image
Canadian Tire
Price$133.41
Change+$0.24 (+0.18%)
Volume$4.29K
Capitalization8B
Leons Furniture
Price$20.49
Change+$0.11 (+0.54%)
Volume$900
Capitalization1.14B
CDNAF vs LEFUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CDNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LEFUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDNAF vs. LEFUF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNAF is a Hold and LEFUF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CDNAF: $133.41 vs. LEFUF: $20.49)
Brand notoriety: CDNAF and LEFUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDNAF: 28% vs. LEFUF: 182%
Market capitalization -- CDNAF: $8B vs. LEFUF: $1.14B
CDNAF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $8B. LEFUF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $1.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDNAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLEFUF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CDNAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LEFUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LEFUF is a better buy in the long-term than CDNAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDNAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LEFUF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDNAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LEFUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LEFUF is a better buy in the short-term than CDNAF.

Price Growth

CDNAF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -0.66% price change this week, while LEFUF (@Specialty Stores) price change was +3.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+2.51% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDNAF($8B) has a higher market cap than LEFUF($1.14B). CDNAF has higher P/E ratio than LEFUF: CDNAF (12.22) vs LEFUF (9.03). CDNAF YTD gains are higher at: 27.178 vs. LEFUF (14.300). CDNAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.22B vs. LEFUF (357M). CDNAF has more cash in the bank: 489M vs. LEFUF (188M). LEFUF has less debt than CDNAF: LEFUF (542M) vs CDNAF (8.38B). CDNAF has higher revenues than LEFUF: CDNAF (17.7B) vs LEFUF (2.48B).
CDNAFLEFUFCDNAF / LEFUF
Capitalization8B1.14B704%
EBITDA2.22B357M622%
Gain YTD27.17814.300190%
P/E Ratio12.229.03135%
Revenue17.7B2.48B713%
Total Cash489M188M260%
Total Debt8.38B542M1,546%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDNAF vs LEFUF: Fundamental Ratings
CDNAF
LEFUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9594
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5031
SMR RATING
1..100
5555
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4145
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9737
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDNAF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as LEFUF (16). This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to LEFUF’s over the last 12 months.

LEFUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNAF (50). This means that LEFUF’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

LEFUF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNAF (55). This means that LEFUF’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

CDNAF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as LEFUF (45). This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to LEFUF’s over the last 12 months.

LEFUF's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDNAF (97). This means that LEFUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDNAFLEFUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LEFUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IDEV75.820.53
+0.70%
iShares Core MSCI Intl Dev Mkts ETF
CUT30.220.08
+0.28%
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
SCHQ31.78N/A
N/A
Schwab Long-Term US Treasury ETF
SUPL37.79N/A
N/A
ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF
BSMS23.19-0.01
-0.02%
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Muncpl Bd ETF

CDNAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNAF has been loosely correlated with DUFRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDNAF jumps, then DUFRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNAF
1D Price
Change %
CDNAF100%
+0.18%
DUFRY - CDNAF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
LEFUF - CDNAF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANCTF - CDNAF
17%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
AOCIF - CDNAF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWTL - CDNAF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LEFUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LEFUF and AOCIF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LEFUF and AOCIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LEFUF
1D Price
Change %
LEFUF100%
N/A
AOCIF - LEFUF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDNAF - LEFUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
KGFHF - LEFUF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTTRY - LEFUF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IHCPF - LEFUF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More