Advertisement
CDNAF vs LEFUF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNAF is a Hold and LEFUF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CDNAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLEFUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CDNAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LEFUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CDNAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LEFUF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CDNAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- LEFUF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CDNAF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -3.47% price change this week, while LEFUF (@Specialty Stores) price change was -0.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.32%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (+0.84% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| CDNAF | LEFUF | CDNAF / LEFUF | |
| Capitalization | 6.61B | 1.42B | 467% |
| EBITDA | 2.03B | 354M | 573% |
| Gain YTD | 12.869 | 17.345 | 74% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.13 | 12.39 | 90% |
| Revenue | 16.7B | 2.54B | 657% |
| Total Cash | 1.19B | 267M | 446% |
| Total Debt | 7.62B | 430M | 1,773% |
CDNAF | LEFUF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 44 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 61 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CDNAF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as LEFUF (14). This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to LEFUF’s over the last 12 months.
LEFUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDNAF (79). This means that LEFUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.
LEFUF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNAF (59). This means that LEFUF’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.
LEFUF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNAF (59). This means that LEFUF’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.
LEFUF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDNAF (95). This means that LEFUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.
| CDNAF | LEFUF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 61% | 20 days ago 45% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 28 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 43% |
Advertisement
CDNAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNAF has been loosely correlated with DUFRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDNAF jumps, then DUFRY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CDNAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDNAF | 100% | -0.97% | ||
| DUFRY - CDNAF | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| LEFUF - CDNAF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ANCTF - CDNAF | 17% Poorly correlated | +1.37% | ||
| AOCIF - CDNAF | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.95% | ||
| BWTL - CDNAF | 7% Poorly correlated | +8.30% | ||
More | ||||
LEFUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LEFUF and AOCIF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LEFUF and AOCIF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LEFUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEFUF | 100% | N/A | ||
| AOCIF - LEFUF | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.95% | ||
| CDNAF - LEFUF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.97% | ||
| KGFHF - LEFUF | 14% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MTTRY - LEFUF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IHCPF - LEFUF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||