CDNAF
Price
$121.94
Change
+$1.19 (+0.99%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.82B
LEFUF
Price
$21.50
Change
+$0.08 (+0.37%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.47B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDNAF vs LEFUF

Header iconCDNAF vs LEFUF Comparison
Open Charts CDNAF vs LEFUFBanner chart's image
Canadian Tire
Price$121.94
Change+$1.19 (+0.99%)
Volume$72.32K
Capitalization6.82B
Leons Furniture
Price$21.50
Change+$0.08 (+0.37%)
Volume$332
Capitalization1.47B
CDNAF vs LEFUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CDNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LEFUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDNAF vs. LEFUF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNAF is a Hold and LEFUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CDNAF: $121.94 vs. LEFUF: $21.50)
Brand notoriety: CDNAF and LEFUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDNAF: 501% vs. LEFUF: 26%
Market capitalization -- CDNAF: $6.82B vs. LEFUF: $1.47B
CDNAF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $6.82B. LEFUF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $1.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $50.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDNAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLEFUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDNAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LEFUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LEFUF is a better buy in the long-term than CDNAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDNAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LEFUF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDNAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LEFUF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CDNAF is a better buy in the short-term than LEFUF.

Price Growth

CDNAF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -2.06% price change this week, while LEFUF (@Specialty Stores) price change was -0.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-1.68% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDNAF($6.82B) has a higher market cap than LEFUF($1.47B). LEFUF has higher P/E ratio than CDNAF: LEFUF (12.63) vs CDNAF (11.44). LEFUF YTD gains are higher at: 19.911 vs. CDNAF (16.244). CDNAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.03B vs. LEFUF (354M). CDNAF has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. LEFUF (267M). LEFUF has less debt than CDNAF: LEFUF (430M) vs CDNAF (7.62B). CDNAF has higher revenues than LEFUF: CDNAF (16.7B) vs LEFUF (2.54B).
CDNAFLEFUFCDNAF / LEFUF
Capitalization6.82B1.47B463%
EBITDA2.03B354M573%
Gain YTD16.24419.91182%
P/E Ratio11.4412.6391%
Revenue16.7B2.54B657%
Total Cash1.19B267M446%
Total Debt7.62B430M1,773%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDNAF vs LEFUF: Fundamental Ratings
CDNAF
LEFUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8289
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7040
SMR RATING
1..100
5955
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9360
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDNAF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as LEFUF (16). This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to LEFUF’s over the last 12 months.

LEFUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNAF (70). This means that LEFUF’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

LEFUF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNAF (59). This means that LEFUF’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

LEFUF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNAF (60). This means that LEFUF’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

LEFUF's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDNAF (93). This means that LEFUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDNAFLEFUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LEFUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IRLCX44.150.27
+0.62%
Voya Russell Large Cap Index Port S
MINGX43.170.16
+0.37%
MFS International Intrinsic Value R3
GFSIX19.750.01
+0.05%
Gabelli Global Financial Services I
NDVBX16.49-0.05
-0.30%
MFS New Discovery Value B
WOOPX18.47-0.09
-0.48%
JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity I

CDNAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNAF has been loosely correlated with DUFRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDNAF jumps, then DUFRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNAF
1D Price
Change %
CDNAF100%
+0.99%
DUFRY - CDNAF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
LEFUF - CDNAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
ANCTF - CDNAF
17%
Poorly correlated
+5.71%
AOCIF - CDNAF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWTL - CDNAF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
More

LEFUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LEFUF and AOCIF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LEFUF and AOCIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LEFUF
1D Price
Change %
LEFUF100%
+0.37%
AOCIF - LEFUF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDNAF - LEFUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
KGFHF - LEFUF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTTRY - LEFUF
9%
Poorly correlated
-12.35%
IHCPF - LEFUF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More