CDNAF
Price
$123.10
Change
-$0.06 (-0.05%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.72B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KMX
Price
$39.02
Change
+$0.31 (+0.80%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.73B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDNAF vs KMX

Header iconCDNAF vs KMX Comparison
Open Charts CDNAF vs KMXBanner chart's image
Canadian Tire
Price$123.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.05%)
Volume$1.62K
Capitalization6.72B
CarMax
Price$39.02
Change+$0.31 (+0.80%)
Volume$2.76M
Capitalization5.73B
CDNAF vs KMX Comparison Chart in %
CDNAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KMX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDNAF vs. KMX commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNAF is a Hold and KMX is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CDNAF: $121.04 vs. KMX: $38.72)
Brand notoriety: CDNAF and KMX are both not notable
CDNAF represents the Specialty Stores, while KMX is part of the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDNAF: 8% vs. KMX: 25%
Market capitalization -- CDNAF: $6.72B vs. KMX: $5.73B
CDNAF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $6.72B. KMX’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $5.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $48.51B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $55.86B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $3.94B. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $3.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDNAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKMX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CDNAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KMX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDNAF is a better buy in the long-term than KMX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDNAF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KMX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDNAF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • KMX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CDNAF is a better buy in the short-term than KMX.

Price Growth

CDNAF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +0.74% price change this week, while KMX (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +3.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +1.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.44%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

KMX is expected to report earnings on Dec 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+1.48% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

@Automotive Aftermarket (+0.32% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDNAF($6.72B) has a higher market cap than KMX($5.73B). CDNAF has higher P/E ratio than KMX: CDNAF (12.11) vs KMX (11.44). CDNAF YTD gains are higher at: 15.386 vs. KMX (-52.642). CDNAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.03B vs. KMX (1.9B). CDNAF has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. KMX (540M). CDNAF has less debt than KMX: CDNAF (7.62B) vs KMX (19.1B). KMX has higher revenues than CDNAF: KMX (26.4B) vs CDNAF (16.7B).
CDNAFKMXCDNAF / KMX
Capitalization6.72B5.73B117%
EBITDA2.03B1.9B107%
Gain YTD15.386-52.642-29%
P/E Ratio12.1111.44106%
Revenue16.7B26.4B63%
Total Cash1.19B540M220%
Total Debt7.62B19.1B40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDNAF vs KMX: Fundamental Ratings
CDNAF
KMX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
87100
SMR RATING
1..100
5976
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5665
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5297
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDNAF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KMX (79) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CDNAF’s stock grew significantly faster than KMX’s over the last 12 months.

CDNAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as KMX (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to KMX’s over the last 12 months.

CDNAF's SMR Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as KMX (76) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to KMX’s over the last 12 months.

CDNAF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as KMX (65) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to KMX’s over the last 12 months.

CDNAF's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KMX (97) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CDNAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KMX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDNAFKMX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDNAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KMX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASVIX9.92N/A
N/A
American Century Small Cap Value Inv
MSAYX22.65N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Asia Opp R6
TBDQX22.64N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth R6
TEURX31.64N/A
N/A
Franklin Mutual International Value C
RIRGX80.59N/A
N/A
American Funds Capital Income Bldr R6

CDNAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNAF has been loosely correlated with PAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDNAF jumps, then PAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNAF
1D Price
Change %
CDNAF100%
N/A
PAG - CDNAF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
SAH - CDNAF
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
AN - CDNAF
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
KMX - CDNAF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
LAD - CDNAF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
More

KMX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMX has been loosely correlated with ACVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KMX jumps, then ACVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMX
1D Price
Change %
KMX100%
+0.41%
ACVA - KMX
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
CPRT - KMX
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
LAD - KMX
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
FND - KMX
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
HZO - KMX
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.07%
More