CDNAF
Price
$118.61
Change
+$0.29 (+0.25%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.68B
CDNTF
Price
$185.17
Change
-$8.16 (-4.22%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
6.68B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDNAF vs CDNTF

Header iconCDNAF vs CDNTF Comparison
Open Charts CDNAF vs CDNTFBanner chart's image
Canadian Tire
Price$118.61
Change+$0.29 (+0.25%)
Volume$2.86K
Capitalization6.68B
Canadian Tire
Price$185.17
Change-$8.16 (-4.22%)
Volume$17
Capitalization6.68B
CDNAF vs CDNTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CDNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDNTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDNAF vs. CDNTF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNAF is a Hold and CDNTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CDNAF: $118.29 vs. CDNTF: $185.17)
Brand notoriety: CDNAF and CDNTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDNAF: 13% vs. CDNTF: 269%
Market capitalization -- CDNAF: $6.68B vs. CDNTF: $6.68B
CDNAF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $6.68B. CDNTF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $6.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $49.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDNAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCDNTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDNAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CDNTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CDNAF and CDNTF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDNAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CDNTF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDNAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CDNTF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CDNAF and CDNTF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CDNAF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -1.10% price change this week, while CDNTF (@Specialty Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.92% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDNAF($6.68B) and CDNTF($6.68B) have the same market capitalization . CDNTF has higher P/E ratio than CDNAF: CDNTF (17.55) vs CDNAF (11.21). CDNTF YTD gains are higher at: 34.930 vs. CDNAF (13.070). CDNAF (2.03B) and CDNTF (2.03B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . CDNAF (1.19B) and CDNTF (1.19B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CDNAF (7.62B) and CDNTF (7.62B) have identical debt. CDNAF (16.7B) and CDNTF (16.7B) have equivalent revenues.
CDNAFCDNTFCDNAF / CDNTF
Capitalization6.68B6.68B100%
EBITDA2.03B2.03B100%
Gain YTD13.07034.93037%
P/E Ratio11.2117.5564%
Revenue16.7B16.7B100%
Total Cash1.19B1.19B100%
Total Debt7.62B7.62B100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDNAF vs CDNTF: Fundamental Ratings
CDNAF
CDNTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5194
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8084
SMR RATING
1..100
5959
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6059
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9593
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDNAF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNTF (18). This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to CDNTF’s over the last 12 months.

CDNAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNTF (84). This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to CDNTF’s over the last 12 months.

CDNAF's SMR Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNTF (59). This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to CDNTF’s over the last 12 months.

CDNTF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNAF (60). This means that CDNTF’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

CDNTF's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNAF (95). This means that CDNTF’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDNAFCDNTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
61%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
4%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDNTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UPRO109.441.76
+1.63%
ProShares UltraPro S&P500
FORH25.660.19
+0.74%
Formidable ETF
XPAY55.130.36
+0.65%
Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF
FBCV34.010.21
+0.64%
Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF
IBMQ25.64-0.05
-0.18%
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bd ETF

CDNAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNAF has been loosely correlated with DUFRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDNAF jumps, then DUFRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNAF
1D Price
Change %
CDNAF100%
N/A
DUFRY - CDNAF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LEFUF - CDNAF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANCTF - CDNAF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AOCIF - CDNAF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWTL - CDNAF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CDNTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CDNTF and MRGO have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDNTF and MRGO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNTF
1D Price
Change %
CDNTF100%
N/A
MRGO - CDNTF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PAHGF - CDNTF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYYHF - CDNTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDNAF - CDNTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMEIF - CDNTF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More