CDNAF
Price
$133.41
Change
+$0.24 (+0.18%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
8B
CDNTF
Price
$195.44
Change
+$8.68 (+4.65%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.84B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDNAF vs CDNTF

Header iconCDNAF vs CDNTF Comparison
Open Charts CDNAF vs CDNTFBanner chart's image
Canadian Tire
Price$133.41
Change+$0.24 (+0.18%)
Volume$4.29K
Capitalization8B
Canadian Tire
Price$195.44
Change+$8.68 (+4.65%)
Volume$1
Capitalization5.84B
CDNAF vs CDNTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CDNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDNTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDNAF vs. CDNTF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNAF is a Hold and CDNTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CDNAF: $133.41 vs. CDNTF: $195.43)
Brand notoriety: CDNAF and CDNTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDNAF: 28% vs. CDNTF: 4%
Market capitalization -- CDNAF: $8B vs. CDNTF: $5.84B
CDNAF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $8B. CDNTF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $5.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDNAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCDNTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDNAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CDNTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDNAF is a better buy in the long-term than CDNTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDNAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CDNTF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDNAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CDNTF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CDNTF is a better buy in the short-term than CDNAF.

Price Growth

CDNAF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -0.66% price change this week, while CDNTF (@Specialty Stores) price change was +4.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +3.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.67%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+3.23% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDNAF($8B) has a higher market cap than CDNTF($5.84B). CDNTF has higher P/E ratio than CDNAF: CDNTF (65.00) vs CDNAF (12.22). CDNTF YTD gains are higher at: 42.407 vs. CDNAF (27.178). CDNAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.22B vs. CDNTF (1.48B). CDNAF has more cash in the bank: 489M vs. CDNTF (464M). CDNAF has less debt than CDNTF: CDNAF (8.38B) vs CDNTF (8.82B). CDNAF has higher revenues than CDNTF: CDNAF (17.7B) vs CDNTF (16.7B).
CDNAFCDNTFCDNAF / CDNTF
Capitalization8B5.84B137%
EBITDA2.22B1.48B150%
Gain YTD27.17842.40764%
P/E Ratio12.2265.0019%
Revenue17.7B16.7B106%
Total Cash489M464M105%
Total Debt8.38B8.82B95%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDNAF vs CDNTF: Fundamental Ratings
CDNAF
CDNTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5078
SMR RATING
1..100
5555
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4143
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9798
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDNAF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNTF (21). This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to CDNTF’s over the last 12 months.

CDNAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNTF (78). This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to CDNTF’s over the last 12 months.

CDNAF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNTF (55). This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to CDNTF’s over the last 12 months.

CDNAF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNTF (43). This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to CDNTF’s over the last 12 months.

CDNAF's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNTF (98). This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to CDNTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDNAFCDNTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
23%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDNTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OEF303.111.80
+0.60%
iShares S&P 100 ETF
EFU10.93N/A
N/A
ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE
FTHF26.44-0.02
-0.09%
FT EM Human Flourishing ETF
XDEC38.65-0.06
-0.17%
FT Vest US Eq Enh & Mdt Bfr ETF Dec
PCRB48.78-0.09
-0.19%
Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF

CDNAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNAF has been loosely correlated with DUFRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDNAF jumps, then DUFRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNAF
1D Price
Change %
CDNAF100%
+0.18%
DUFRY - CDNAF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
LEFUF - CDNAF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANCTF - CDNAF
17%
Poorly correlated
-2.21%
AOCIF - CDNAF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWTL - CDNAF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CDNTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CDNTF and MRGO have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDNTF and MRGO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNTF
1D Price
Change %
CDNTF100%
N/A
MRGO - CDNTF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PAHGF - CDNTF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYYHF - CDNTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDNAF - CDNTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
CMEIF - CDNTF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More