CDNAF
Price
$122.39
Change
+$0.45 (+0.37%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
6.85B
CDNTF
Price
$193.33
Change
+$3.32 (+1.75%)
Updated
Jul 29 closing price
Capitalization
6.85B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDNAF vs CDNTF

Header iconCDNAF vs CDNTF Comparison
Open Charts CDNAF vs CDNTFBanner chart's image
Canadian Tire
Price$122.39
Change+$0.45 (+0.37%)
Volume$3.01K
Capitalization6.85B
Canadian Tire
Price$193.33
Change+$3.32 (+1.75%)
Volume$4
Capitalization6.85B
CDNAF vs CDNTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CDNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDNTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDNAF vs. CDNTF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNAF is a Buy and CDNTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CDNAF: $122.39 vs. CDNTF: $193.33)
Brand notoriety: CDNAF and CDNTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDNAF: 21% vs. CDNTF: 29%
Market capitalization -- CDNAF: $6.85B vs. CDNTF: $6.85B
CDNAF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $6.85B. CDNTF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $6.85B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $51.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDNAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCDNTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDNAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CDNTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CDNAF and CDNTF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDNAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CDNTF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDNAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CDNTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CDNTF is a better buy in the short-term than CDNAF.

Price Growth

CDNAF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -1.48% price change this week, while CDNTF (@Specialty Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-0.64% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDNAF($6.85B) and CDNTF($6.85B) have the same market capitalization . CDNTF has higher P/E ratio than CDNAF: CDNTF (18.19) vs CDNAF (11.53). CDNTF YTD gains are higher at: 40.874 vs. CDNAF (16.673). CDNAF (2.03B) and CDNTF (2.03B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . CDNAF (1.19B) and CDNTF (1.19B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CDNAF (7.62B) and CDNTF (7.62B) have identical debt. CDNAF (16.7B) and CDNTF (16.7B) have equivalent revenues.
CDNAFCDNTFCDNAF / CDNTF
Capitalization6.85B6.85B100%
EBITDA2.03B2.03B100%
Gain YTD16.67340.87441%
P/E Ratio11.5318.1963%
Revenue16.7B16.7B100%
Total Cash1.19B1.19B100%
Total Debt7.62B7.62B100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDNAF vs CDNTF: Fundamental Ratings
CDNAF
CDNTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2341
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7180
SMR RATING
1..100
5959
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5351
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9493
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDNAF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNTF (20). This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to CDNTF’s over the last 12 months.

CDNAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNTF (80). This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to CDNTF’s over the last 12 months.

CDNAF's SMR Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNTF (59). This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to CDNTF’s over the last 12 months.

CDNTF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNAF (53). This means that CDNTF’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

CDNTF's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNAF (94). This means that CDNTF’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDNAFCDNTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
60%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDNTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TECL101.191.44
+1.44%
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X ETF
LQIG96.040.65
+0.69%
SPDR MarketAxess Inv Grd 400 Corp Bd ETF
FLCA44.130.24
+0.54%
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF
SMAX26.590.04
+0.15%
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF
DBB19.79-0.11
-0.55%
Invesco DB Base Metals

CDNAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNAF has been loosely correlated with DUFRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDNAF jumps, then DUFRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNAF
1D Price
Change %
CDNAF100%
+0.37%
DUFRY - CDNAF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
LEFUF - CDNAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
ANCTF - CDNAF
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
AOCIF - CDNAF
17%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
BWTL - CDNAF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
More

CDNTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CDNTF and MRGO have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDNTF and MRGO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNTF
1D Price
Change %
CDNTF100%
N/A
MRGO - CDNTF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PAHGF - CDNTF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYYHF - CDNTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDNAF - CDNTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
CMEIF - CDNTF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More