CDNA vs RYLPF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNA is a Buy and RYLPF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CDNA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRYLPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CDNA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RYLPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CDNA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CDNA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CDNA (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -9.76% price change this week, while RYLPF (@Medical Specialties) price change was -4.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -2.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.40%.
Reported Earning Dates
CDNA is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical Specialties (-2.40% weekly)Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.
| CDNA | RYLPF | CDNA / RYLPF | |
| Capitalization | 548M | 19.2B | 3% |
| EBITDA | -84.92M | -210M | 40% |
| Gain YTD | 79.583 | 15.636 | 509% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 29.76 | - |
| Revenue | 280M | 18.4B | 2% |
| Total Cash | 235M | 968M | 24% |
| Total Debt | 34.2M | 8.22B | 0% |
CDNA | RYLPF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 92 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RYLPF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CDNA (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that RYLPF’s stock grew significantly faster than CDNA’s over the last 12 months.
RYLPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNA (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that RYLPF’s stock grew similarly to CDNA’s over the last 12 months.
RYLPF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNA (97) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that RYLPF’s stock grew similarly to CDNA’s over the last 12 months.
CDNA's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as RYLPF (60) in the null industry. This means that CDNA’s stock grew similarly to RYLPF’s over the last 12 months.
CDNA's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Medical Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for RYLPF (81) in the null industry. This means that CDNA’s stock grew significantly faster than RYLPF’s over the last 12 months.
| CDNA | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 0% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% |
CDNA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNA has been loosely correlated with LH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDNA jumps, then LH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CDNA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDNA | 100% | -5.40% | ||
| LH - CDNA | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.27% | ||
| VCYT - CDNA | 44% Loosely correlated | -6.30% | ||
| MTD - CDNA | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| BLFS - CDNA | 41% Loosely correlated | -10.20% | ||
| TMO - CDNA | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
More | ||||
RYLPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RYLPF has been loosely correlated with MTD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RYLPF jumps, then MTD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RYLPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RYLPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MTD - RYLPF | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| CDNA - RYLPF | 28% Poorly correlated | -5.40% | ||
| MBGNF - RYLPF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SRTS - RYLPF | 23% Poorly correlated | +5.96% | ||
| WRBY - RYLPF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.04% | ||
More | ||||