CDMGF
Price
$26.16
Change
+$3.71 (+16.53%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
3.1B
FREVS
Price
$16.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
141.54M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDMGF vs FREVS

Header iconCDMGF vs FREVS Comparison
Open Charts CDMGF vs FREVSBanner chart's image
Icade SA
Price$26.16
Change+$3.71 (+16.53%)
Volume$200
Capitalization3.1B
First Real Estate Investment Trust of New Jersey
Price$16.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$700
Capitalization141.54M
CDMGF vs FREVS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CDMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FREVS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDMGF vs. FREVS commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDMGF is a Hold and FREVS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CDMGF: $26.16 vs. FREVS: $16.25)
Brand notoriety: CDMGF and FREVS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDMGF: 100% vs. FREVS: 113%
Market capitalization -- CDMGF: $3.1B vs. FREVS: $141.54M
CDMGF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $3.1B. FREVS’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $141.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDMGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFREVS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CDMGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FREVS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FREVS is a better buy in the long-term than CDMGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDMGF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FREVS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDMGF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • FREVS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CDMGF is a better buy in the short-term than FREVS.

Price Growth

CDMGF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FREVS (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +1.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.40%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.28% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDMGF($3.1B) has a higher market cap than FREVS($142M). FREVS has higher P/E ratio than CDMGF: FREVS (158.73) vs CDMGF (47.39). CDMGF YTD gains are higher at: 17.679 vs. FREVS (-4.372). FREVS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11M vs. CDMGF (-260.3M). CDMGF has more cash in the bank: 697M vs. FREVS (35.7M). FREVS has less debt than CDMGF: FREVS (137M) vs CDMGF (5.46B). CDMGF has higher revenues than FREVS: CDMGF (1.82B) vs FREVS (27.9M).
CDMGFFREVSCDMGF / FREVS
Capitalization3.1B142M2,182%
EBITDA-260.3M11M-2,366%
Gain YTD17.679-4.372-404%
P/E Ratio47.39158.7330%
Revenue1.82B27.9M6,523%
Total Cash697M35.7M1,952%
Total Debt5.46B137M3,983%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDMGF vs FREVS: Fundamental Ratings
CDMGF
FREVS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10026
SMR RATING
1..100
9317
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4460
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDMGF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FREVS (49). This means that CDMGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FREVS’s over the last 12 months.

FREVS's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CDMGF (100). This means that FREVS’s stock grew significantly faster than CDMGF’s over the last 12 months.

FREVS's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CDMGF (93). This means that FREVS’s stock grew significantly faster than CDMGF’s over the last 12 months.

CDMGF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as FREVS (60). This means that CDMGF’s stock grew similarly to FREVS’s over the last 12 months.

CDMGF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FREVS (100). This means that CDMGF’s stock grew significantly faster than FREVS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDMGFFREVS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FREVS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSHLX51.380.68
+1.34%
Morgan Stanley Inst Growth L
VIGAX227.542.46
+1.09%
Vanguard Growth Index Admiral
ZDIVX27.390.15
+0.55%
Zacks Dividend Investor
LIDAX9.440.03
+0.32%
Lord Abbett International Value A
MFWGX17.630.02
+0.11%
MFS Global Total Return R1

CDMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDMGF has been closely correlated with CHLWF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDMGF jumps, then CHLWF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDMGF
1D Price
Change %
CDMGF100%
N/A
CHLWF - CDMGF
68%
Closely correlated
N/A
FREVS - CDMGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CROMF - CDMGF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DBMBF - CDMGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DBMXF - CDMGF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FREVS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FREVS and CHLWF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FREVS and CHLWF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FREVS
1D Price
Change %
FREVS100%
N/A
CHLWF - FREVS
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDMGF - FREVS
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRMUF - FREVS
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
FESNF - FREVS
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DDHRF - FREVS
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More