CDMGF
Price
$26.16
Change
+$3.71 (+16.53%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
3.1B
DBMBF
Price
$1.64
Change
+$0.03 (+1.86%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.48B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDMGF vs DBMBF

Header iconCDMGF vs DBMBF Comparison
Open Charts CDMGF vs DBMBFBanner chart's image
Icade SA
Price$26.16
Change+$3.71 (+16.53%)
Volume$200
Capitalization3.1B
Deutsche Bank Mexico SA
Price$1.64
Change+$0.03 (+1.86%)
Volume$15.4K
Capitalization1.48B
CDMGF vs DBMBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CDMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DBMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDMGF vs. DBMBF commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDMGF is a Hold and DBMBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CDMGF: $26.16 vs. DBMBF: $1.64)
Brand notoriety: CDMGF and DBMBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDMGF: 100% vs. DBMBF: 367%
Market capitalization -- CDMGF: $3.1B vs. DBMBF: $1.48B
CDMGF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $3.1B. DBMBF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $1.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDMGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDBMBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDMGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DBMBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DBMBF is a better buy in the long-term than CDMGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDMGF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DBMBF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDMGF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • DBMBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CDMGF is a better buy in the short-term than DBMBF.

Price Growth

CDMGF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DBMBF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -0.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.40%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.28% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDMGF($3.1B) has a higher market cap than DBMBF($1.48B). CDMGF has higher P/E ratio than DBMBF: CDMGF (47.39) vs DBMBF (12.47). CDMGF YTD gains are higher at: 17.679 vs. DBMBF (10.811). DBMBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.83B vs. CDMGF (-260.3M). CDMGF has more cash in the bank: 697M vs. DBMBF (414M). CDMGF has less debt than DBMBF: CDMGF (5.46B) vs DBMBF (16B). DBMBF has higher revenues than CDMGF: DBMBF (4.11B) vs CDMGF (1.82B).
CDMGFDBMBFCDMGF / DBMBF
Capitalization3.1B1.48B209%
EBITDA-260.3M2.83B-9%
Gain YTD17.67910.811164%
P/E Ratio47.3912.47380%
Revenue1.82B4.11B44%
Total Cash697M414M168%
Total Debt5.46B16B34%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDMGF vs DBMBF: Fundamental Ratings
CDMGF
DBMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10047
SMR RATING
1..100
9336
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4457
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
294
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDMGF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as DBMBF (26). This means that CDMGF’s stock grew similarly to DBMBF’s over the last 12 months.

DBMBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDMGF (100). This means that DBMBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDMGF’s over the last 12 months.

DBMBF's SMR Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDMGF (93). This means that DBMBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDMGF’s over the last 12 months.

CDMGF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as DBMBF (57). This means that CDMGF’s stock grew similarly to DBMBF’s over the last 12 months.

CDMGF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DBMBF (94). This means that CDMGF’s stock grew significantly faster than DBMBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDMGFDBMBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DBMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDTRX203.142.87
+1.43%
Franklin DynaTech R6
VEOAX28.080.28
+1.01%
Vanguard Global Environmental Opp StkAdm
SEBLX29.540.14
+0.48%
Touchstone Balanced A
LSWWX26.150.08
+0.31%
Loomis Sayles Global Allocation Y
HNCJX19.97-0.02
-0.10%
Hartford International Growth I

CDMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDMGF has been closely correlated with CHLWF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDMGF jumps, then CHLWF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDMGF
1D Price
Change %
CDMGF100%
N/A
CHLWF - CDMGF
68%
Closely correlated
N/A
FREVS - CDMGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CROMF - CDMGF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DBMBF - CDMGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DBMXF - CDMGF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DBMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DBMBF and TKURF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DBMBF and TKURF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBMBF
1D Price
Change %
DBMBF100%
N/A
TKURF - DBMBF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNBLF - DBMBF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCPPF - DBMBF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CROMF - DBMBF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDPYF - DBMBF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
More