Advertisement
CDLR vs MTZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDLR is a Hold and MTZ is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CDLR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CDLR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CDLR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CDLR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- MTZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CDLR (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -9.72% price change this week, while MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +3.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +1.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +234.96%.
Reported Earning Dates
CDLR is expected to report earnings on Nov 20, 2025.
MTZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (+1.35% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| CDLR | MTZ | CDLR / MTZ | |
| Capitalization | 1.69B | 15.9B | 11% |
| EBITDA | 318M | 978M | 33% |
| Gain YTD | -15.137 | 48.274 | -31% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.07 | 60.08 | 10% |
| Revenue | 465M | 13B | 4% |
| Total Cash | 53M | 191M | 28% |
| Total Debt | 1.21B | 2.67B | 45% |
MTZ | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CDLR | MTZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 63% | 5 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RYVVX | 91.60 | 0.72 | +0.79% |
| Rydex S&P 500 Pure Value C | |||
| IACIX | 10.88 | 0.08 | +0.74% |
| VY® American Century Sm-Mid Cp Val I | |||
| MIOIX | 33.43 | 0.10 | +0.30% |
| Morgan Stanley Inst International Opp I | |||
| OSCAX | 22.89 | 0.03 | +0.13% |
| Invesco Main Street Small Cap A | |||
| PRAFX | 17.36 | -0.24 | -1.36% |
| T. Rowe Price Real Assets | |||
CDLR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CDLR and SHIM have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDLR and SHIM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CDLR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDLR | 100% | -1.61% | ||
| SHIM - CDLR | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.24% | ||
| AMRC - CDLR | 29% Poorly correlated | -6.29% | ||
| MTZ - CDLR | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.76% | ||
| ACM - CDLR | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
| KBR - CDLR | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.87% | ||
More | ||||
MTZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTZ | 100% | -0.76% | ||
| PWR - MTZ | 84% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| EME - MTZ | 82% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| FIX - MTZ | 80% Closely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| STRL - MTZ | 77% Closely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| PRIM - MTZ | 77% Closely correlated | -1.47% | ||
More | ||||