Advertisement
CDLR vs MCDIF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDLR is a Hold and MCDIF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CDLR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMCDIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CDLR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MCDIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CDLR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCDIF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CDLR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- MCDIF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CDLR (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -3.86% price change this week, while MCDIF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +1.86% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +203.38%.
Reported Earning Dates
CDLR is expected to report earnings on Nov 20, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-0.42% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| CDLR | MCDIF | CDLR / MCDIF | |
| Capitalization | 1.82B | N/A | - |
| EBITDA | 160M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.598 | -27.000 | 32% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.71 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 295M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 94.1M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.07B | N/A | - |
| CDLR | MCDIF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 62% |
Advertisement
CDLR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CDLR and MTZ have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDLR and MTZ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CDLR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDLR | 100% | -0.39% | ||
| MTZ - CDLR | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.68% | ||
| ACM - CDLR | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.50% | ||
| AMRC - CDLR | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.36% | ||
| SHIM - CDLR | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
| KBR - CDLR | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.16% | ||
More | ||||
MCDIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MCDIF and SLND have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCDIF and SLND's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCDIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCDIF | 100% | -6.41% | ||
| SLND - MCDIF | 15% Poorly correlated | +2.25% | ||
| SHIM - MCDIF | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
| TTEK - MCDIF | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.83% | ||
| CDLR - MCDIF | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.39% | ||
| BWMN - MCDIF | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.32% | ||
More | ||||