Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDHAX vs FSGEX
CDHAX vs FSGEX Comparison
Open Charts CDHAX vs FSGEX
Calvert International Responsible Idx A
Price$37.52
Change+$0.17 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.31B
Fidelity Series Global ex US Index
Price$18.40
Change+$0.06 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.1B
CDHAX vs FSGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDHAX vs. FSGEX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDHAX is a Buy and FSGEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 62.1B vs. CDHAX (1.31B). FSGEX pays higher dividends than CDHAX: FSGEX (2.31) vs CDHAX (2.07). CDHAX was incepted earlier than FSGEX: CDHAX (10 years) vs FSGEX (16 years). CDHAX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). CDHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. FSGEX (3.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDHAX: FSGEX (0) vs CDHAX (5000). FSGEX (25.37) and CDHAX (24.25) have marching annual gain over last year. CDHAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.93 vs. FSGEX (46.71).
| CDHAX | FSGEX | CDHAX / FSGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.01 | 5,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.01 | 6,500% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.379 | 29.760 | 99% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 62.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 2.31 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.25 | 25.37 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.82 | 53.82 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.93 | 46.71 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.61 | 103.18 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement