Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDHAX vs FSGEX
CDHAX vs FSGEX Comparison
Open Charts CDHAX vs FSGEX
Calvert International Responsible Idx A
Price$37.29
Change-$0.52 (-1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.31B
Fidelity Series Global ex US Index
Price$18.42
Change-$0.19 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.78B
CDHAX vs FSGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDHAX vs. FSGEX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDHAX is a Buy and FSGEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 61.8B vs. CDHAX (1.31B). FSGEX pays higher dividends than CDHAX: FSGEX (2.31) vs CDHAX (2.07). CDHAX was incepted earlier than FSGEX: CDHAX (10 years) vs FSGEX (16 years). CDHAX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). CDHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. FSGEX (3.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDHAX: FSGEX (0) vs CDHAX (5000). FSGEX (28.07) and CDHAX (27.01) have marching annual gain over last year. CDHAX (57.12) and FSGEX (55.09) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CDHAX | FSGEX | CDHAX / FSGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.01 | 5,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.01 | 6,500% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.586 | 30.536 | 94% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 61.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 2.31 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.01 | 28.07 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.63 | 60.28 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.12 | 55.09 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.01 | 107.87 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement