CDGXY
Price
$2.82
Change
+$0.81 (+40.30%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
245.4M
JNBYF
Price
$1.52
Change
-$0.07 (-4.40%)
Updated
Apr 30 closing price
Capitalization
608.53M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDGXY vs JNBYF

Header iconCDGXY vs JNBYF Comparison
Open Charts CDGXY vs JNBYFBanner chart's image
China Dongxiang Group
Price$2.82
Change+$0.81 (+40.30%)
Volume$194
Capitalization245.4M
JNBY Design
Price$1.52
Change-$0.07 (-4.40%)
Volume$800
Capitalization608.53M
CDGXY vs JNBYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CDGXY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JNBYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDGXY vs. JNBYF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDGXY is a Hold and JNBYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CDGXY: $2.82 vs. JNBYF: $1.52)
Brand notoriety: CDGXY and JNBYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Apparel/Footwear industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDGXY: 98% vs. JNBYF: 102%
Market capitalization -- CDGXY: $245.4M vs. JNBYF: $608.53M
CDGXY [@Apparel/Footwear] is valued at $245.4M. JNBYF’s [@Apparel/Footwear] market capitalization is $608.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry ranges from $140.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry is $6.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDGXY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileJNBYF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CDGXY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • JNBYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CDGXY and JNBYF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDGXY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JNBYF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDGXY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • JNBYF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CDGXY is a better buy in the short-term than JNBYF.

Price Growth

CDGXY (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while JNBYF (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was +4.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear (+4.23% weekly)

Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNBYF($609M) has a higher market cap than CDGXY($245M). CDGXY has higher P/E ratio than JNBYF: CDGXY (12.85) vs JNBYF (6.45). CDGXY YTD gains are higher at: 47.644 vs. JNBYF (16.031). JNBYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 718M vs. CDGXY (259M). CDGXY has more cash in the bank: 3.97B vs. JNBYF (952M). CDGXY has less debt than JNBYF: CDGXY (57.6M) vs JNBYF (639M). JNBYF has higher revenues than CDGXY: JNBYF (3.96B) vs CDGXY (1.68B).
CDGXYJNBYFCDGXY / JNBYF
Capitalization245M609M40%
EBITDA259M718M36%
Gain YTD47.64416.031297%
P/E Ratio12.856.45199%
Revenue1.68B3.96B42%
Total Cash3.97B952M417%
Total Debt57.6M639M9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDGXY vs JNBYF: Fundamental Ratings
CDGXY
JNBYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10057
SMR RATING
1..100
5423
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3762
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5893
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JNBYF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDGXY (44). This means that JNBYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDGXY’s over the last 12 months.

JNBYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDGXY (100). This means that JNBYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDGXY’s over the last 12 months.

JNBYF's SMR Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as CDGXY (54). This means that JNBYF’s stock grew similarly to CDGXY’s over the last 12 months.

CDGXY's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as JNBYF (62). This means that CDGXY’s stock grew similarly to JNBYF’s over the last 12 months.

CDGXY's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JNBYF (93). This means that CDGXY’s stock grew somewhat faster than JNBYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDGXYJNBYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
21%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDGXY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JNBYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NMULX11.090.10
+0.91%
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp I
RSOOX39.940.20
+0.50%
Columbia Dividend Opportunity R
IOEZX16.780.08
+0.48%
ICON Equity Income Institutional
GWGZX18.750.09
+0.48%
AMG GW&K Small Mid Cap Core Z
THISX77.590.27
+0.35%
T. Rowe Price Health Sciences I

CDGXY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CDGXY and DPNEY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDGXY and DPNEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDGXY
1D Price
Change %
CDGXY100%
N/A
DPNEY - CDGXY
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HUGPF - CDGXY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXSBY - CDGXY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNBYF - CDGXY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IFABF - CDGXY
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JNBYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JNBYF and HNNMY have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JNBYF and HNNMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JNBYF
1D Price
Change %
JNBYF100%
N/A
HNNMY - JNBYF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
HUGPF - JNBYF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXSBY - JNBYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDGXY - JNBYF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HMRZF - JNBYF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More