Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDGRX vs FSMAX
CDGRX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CDGRX vs FSMAX
Copeland Dividend Growth Fund
Price$12.59
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.49M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$105.74
Change+$0.17 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.06B
CDGRX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDGRX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDGRX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. CDGRX (27.5M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CDGRX: FSMAX (0.57) vs CDGRX (0.00). CDGRX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CDGRX (15 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CDGRX (2.13) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CDGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDGRX: FSMAX (0) vs CDGRX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.86 vs. CDGRX (2.94). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.65 vs. CDGRX (1.35).
| CDGRX | FSMAX | CDGRX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.04 | 3,429% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.04 | 6,086% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.197 | 4.867 | 66% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.5M | 40.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.57 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.94 | 15.86 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.68 | 60.22 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.35 | 25.65 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.26 | 156.70 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement