Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDGCX vs FXAIX
CDGCX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts CDGCX vs FXAIX
Crawford Large Cap Dividend C
Price$15.20
Change+$0.14 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.09M
CDGCX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDGCX vs. FXAIX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDGCX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 723B vs. CDGCX (61.1M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than CDGCX: FXAIX (1.12) vs CDGCX (0.25). CDGCX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: CDGCX (22 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). CDGCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). CDGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDGCX: FXAIX (0) vs CDGCX (2500). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.54 vs. CDGCX (-0.31). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 105.92 vs. CDGCX (26.21).
| CDGCX | FXAIX | CDGCX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.01 | 13,133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.01 | 13,133% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.827 | 14.435 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 61.1M | 723B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 1.12 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.31 | 15.54 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.79 | 87.16 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.21 | 105.92 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.79 | 261.52 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement