Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDGCX vs FXAIX
CDGCX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts CDGCX vs FXAIX
Crawford Large Cap Dividend C
Price$15.39
Change-$0.04 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.81M
CDGCX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDGCX vs. FXAIX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDGCX is a Hold and FXAIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 739B vs. CDGCX (60.8M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than CDGCX: FXAIX (1.11) vs CDGCX (0.25). CDGCX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: CDGCX (22 years) vs FXAIX (15 years). CDGCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). CDGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDGCX: FXAIX (0) vs CDGCX (2500). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.62 vs. CDGCX (2.54). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 102.21 vs. CDGCX (22.93).
| CDGCX | FXAIX | CDGCX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.01 | 13,133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.01 | 13,133% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.489 | 18.478 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 60.8M | 739B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 1.11 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.54 | 14.62 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.42 | 80.13 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.93 | 102.21 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.81 | 274.50 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement