CDDRF
Price
$5.16
Change
+$0.14 (+2.79%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.34B
CRLFF
Price
$5.10
Change
+$0.17 (+3.45%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
745.9M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDDRF vs CRLFF

Header iconCDDRF vs CRLFF Comparison
Open Charts CDDRF vs CRLFFBanner chart's image
HEADWATER EXPL
Price$5.16
Change+$0.14 (+2.79%)
Volume$36.66K
Capitalization1.34B
Cardinal Energy
Price$5.10
Change+$0.17 (+3.45%)
Volume$336.2K
Capitalization745.9M
CDDRF vs CRLFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CRLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDDRF vs. CRLFF commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDDRF is a Hold and CRLFF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (CDDRF: $5.16 vs. CRLFF: $5.10)
Brand notoriety: CDDRF and CRLFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDDRF: 59% vs. CRLFF: 440%
Market capitalization -- CDDRF: $1.34B vs. CRLFF: $745.9M
CDDRF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $1.34B. CRLFF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $745.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDDRF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCRLFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDDRF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CRLFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDDRF is a better buy in the long-term than CRLFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRLFF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CRLFF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CDDRF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +8.36% price change this week, while CRLFF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +8.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +5.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +49.05%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+5.89% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDDRF($1.34B) has a higher market cap than CRLFF($746M). CDDRF has higher P/E ratio than CRLFF: CDDRF (11.67) vs CRLFF (5.06). CRLFF YTD gains are higher at: 13.223 vs. CDDRF (12.418). CDDRF (325M) and CRLFF (318M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . CDDRF has less debt than CRLFF: CDDRF (842K) vs CRLFF (49.1M). CRLFF has higher revenues than CDDRF: CRLFF (601M) vs CDDRF (511M).
CDDRFCRLFFCDDRF / CRLFF
Capitalization1.34B746M180%
EBITDA325M318M102%
Gain YTD12.41813.22394%
P/E Ratio11.675.06231%
Revenue511M601M85%
Total Cash146MN/A-
Total Debt842K49.1M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDDRF vs CRLFF: Fundamental Ratings
CDDRF
CRLFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1823
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2835
SMR RATING
1..100
3360
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4646
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7759
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRLFF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as CDDRF (30). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to CDDRF’s over the last 12 months.

CDDRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as CRLFF (35). This means that CDDRF’s stock grew similarly to CRLFF’s over the last 12 months.

CDDRF's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as CRLFF (60). This means that CDDRF’s stock grew similarly to CRLFF’s over the last 12 months.

CDDRF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as CRLFF (46). This means that CDDRF’s stock grew similarly to CRLFF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as CDDRF (77). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to CDDRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRLFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BKPIX56.64N/A
N/A
ProFunds Banks UltraSector Inv
FSLEX41.52N/A
N/A
Fidelity Environment & Alternative Engy
BGRFX85.44N/A
N/A
Baron Growth Retail
ETLNX14.79N/A
N/A
Eventide Large Cap Focus N
CLEYX20.60-0.68
-3.18%
Columbia Select Large Cap Equity Inst3

CDDRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDDRF has been closely correlated with TNEYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDDRF jumps, then TNEYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDDRF
1D Price
Change %
CDDRF100%
+2.79%
TNEYF - CDDRF
73%
Closely correlated
+3.49%
MEGEF - CDDRF
71%
Closely correlated
+2.45%
ZPTAF - CDDRF
68%
Closely correlated
+2.95%
SPGYF - CDDRF
66%
Closely correlated
+2.98%
AETUF - CDDRF
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.56%
More

CRLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRLFF has been closely correlated with ZPTAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRLFF jumps, then ZPTAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRLFF
1D Price
Change %
CRLFF100%
+3.37%
ZPTAF - CRLFF
74%
Closely correlated
+2.95%
TNEYF - CRLFF
72%
Closely correlated
+3.49%
SPGYF - CRLFF
71%
Closely correlated
+2.98%
CDDRF - CRLFF
69%
Closely correlated
+2.79%
MEGEF - CRLFF
69%
Closely correlated
+2.45%
More