Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDCRX vs FXAIX
CDCRX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts CDCRX vs FXAIX
Copeland Dividend Growth Fund
Price$11.24
Change-$0.73 (-6.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.9M
CDCRX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDCRX vs. FXAIX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDCRX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 753B vs. CDCRX (26.9M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than CDCRX: FXAIX (1.10) vs CDCRX (0.00). CDCRX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: CDCRX (14 years) vs FXAIX (15 years). CDCRX (2.89) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). CDCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDCRX: FXAIX (0) vs CDCRX (1000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. CDCRX (-1.40). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 93.74 vs. CDCRX (-6.57).
| CDCRX | FXAIX | CDCRX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.01 | 13,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.89 | 0.01 | 19,267% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.089 | 1.998 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.9M | 753B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.10 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.40 | 17.83 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.79 | 75.94 | -1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.57 | 93.74 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.99 | 310.97 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement