Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDCRX vs FXAIX
CDCRX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts CDCRX vs FXAIX
Copeland Dividend Growth Fund
Price$12.13
Change+$0.03 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.57M
CDCRX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDCRX vs. FXAIX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDCRX is a StrongBuy and FXAIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 739B vs. CDCRX (27.6M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than CDCRX: FXAIX (1.11) vs CDCRX (0.00). CDCRX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: CDCRX (14 years) vs FXAIX (15 years). CDCRX (2.89) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). CDCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CDCRX: FXAIX (0) vs CDCRX (1000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.07 vs. CDCRX (-10.96). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 99.82 vs. CDCRX (5.82).
| CDCRX | FXAIX | CDCRX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.01 | 13,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.89 | 0.01 | 19,267% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.075 | 17.153 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.6M | 739B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.11 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.96 | 14.07 | -78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.01 | 74.61 | 5% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.82 | 99.82 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.28 | 258.16 | -3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement