CDBMF
Price
$0.56
Change
+$0.01 (+1.82%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
26.59M
SRCAF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.01 (-11.11%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
Capitalization
2.49M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDBMF vs SRCAF

Header iconCDBMF vs SRCAF Comparison
Open Charts CDBMF vs SRCAFBanner chart's image
Cordoba Minerals
Price$0.56
Change+$0.01 (+1.82%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization26.59M
Stria Lithium
Price$0.08
Change-$0.01 (-11.11%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization2.49M
CDBMF vs SRCAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CDBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDBMF vs. SRCAF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDBMF is a Hold and SRCAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CDBMF: $0.56 vs. SRCAF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: CDBMF and SRCAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDBMF: 13% vs. SRCAF: 408%
Market capitalization -- CDBMF: $26.59M vs. SRCAF: $2.49M
CDBMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $26.59M. SRCAF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDBMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSRCAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CDBMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SRCAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SRCAF is a better buy in the long-term than CDBMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDBMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRCAF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDBMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SRCAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CDBMF is a better buy in the short-term than SRCAF.

Price Growth

CDBMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +0.65% price change this week, while SRCAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -9.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.18% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDBMF($26.6M) has a higher market cap than SRCAF($2.49M). CDBMF (99.214) and SRCAF (95.169) have similar YTD gains . SRCAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -524.54K vs. CDBMF (-31.74M). SRCAF has more cash in the bank: 1.34M vs. CDBMF (1.15M). CDBMF has less debt than SRCAF: CDBMF (651K) vs SRCAF (750K). CDBMF (0) and SRCAF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CDBMFSRCAFCDBMF / SRCAF
Capitalization26.6M2.49M1,069%
EBITDA-31.74M-524.54K6,051%
Gain YTD99.21495.169104%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.15M1.34M86%
Total Debt651K750K87%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDBMF vs SRCAF: Fundamental Ratings
CDBMF
SRCAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10098
SMR RATING
1..100
9992
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3936
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SRCAF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CDBMF (71). This means that SRCAF’s stock grew similarly to CDBMF’s over the last 12 months.

SRCAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as CDBMF (100). This means that SRCAF’s stock grew similarly to CDBMF’s over the last 12 months.

SRCAF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as CDBMF (99). This means that SRCAF’s stock grew similarly to CDBMF’s over the last 12 months.

SRCAF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as CDBMF (39). This means that SRCAF’s stock grew similarly to CDBMF’s over the last 12 months.

SRCAF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CDBMF (100). This means that SRCAF’s stock grew similarly to CDBMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDBMFSRCAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRSL14.570.22
+1.53%
Brightstar Lottery PLC
REX54.120.57
+1.06%
REX American Resources Corp
FTNT104.820.05
+0.05%
Fortinet
NC40.07-0.69
-1.69%
NACCO Industries
QTTB2.21-0.10
-4.33%
Q32 Bio

CDBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CDBMF and SRCAF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDBMF and SRCAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDBMF
1D Price
Change %
CDBMF100%
N/A
SRCAF - CDBMF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZDLF - CDBMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
NEXA - CDBMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFRRF - CDBMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.41%
CHXMF - CDBMF
8%
Poorly correlated
-5.27%
More

SRCAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SRCAF has been loosely correlated with GUELF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SRCAF jumps, then GUELF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRCAF
1D Price
Change %
SRCAF100%
N/A
GUELF - SRCAF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
JNOMF - SRCAF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NMG - SRCAF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
LQRCF - SRCAF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.65%
ABRMF - SRCAF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More