Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDAZX vs NLSIX
CDAZX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts CDAZX vs NLSIX
Multi-Manager Directional Alt Strat Inst
Price$8.06
Change-$0.03 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets294.48M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.02
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.81B
CDAZX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDAZX vs. NLSIX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDAZX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.81B vs. CDAZX (294M). CDAZX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: CDAZX (3.45) vs NLSIX (0.02). CDAZX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: CDAZX (9 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). CDAZX (2.38) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). CDAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 344.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). CDAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: CDAZX (100) vs NLSIX (1000000). CDAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.30 vs. NLSIX (8.66). CDAZX return over 5 years is better than : 41.96 vs. NLSIX (26.74).
| CDAZX | NLSIX | CDAZX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 1.32 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 1.32 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.769 | 6.720 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 294M | 7.81B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.45 | 0.02 | 16,785% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.30 | 8.66 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.16 | 24.65 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.96 | 26.74 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 65.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers