CDAB
Price
$18.06
Change
+$0.06 (+0.33%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
RSNHF
Price
$8.80
Change
-$0.23 (-2.55%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
12.99B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDAB vs RSNHF

Header iconCDAB vs RSNHF Comparison
Open Charts CDAB vs RSNHFBanner chart's image
Coeur D Alene Ban
Price$18.06
Change+$0.06 (+0.33%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Resona Holdings
Price$8.80
Change-$0.23 (-2.55%)
Volume$321
Capitalization12.99B
CDAB vs RSNHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CDAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSNHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDAB vs. RSNHF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDAB is a Buy and RSNHF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CDAB: $18.06 vs. RSNHF: $8.80)
Brand notoriety: CDAB and RSNHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDAB: 5% vs. RSNHF: 4%
Market capitalization -- CDAB: $0 vs. RSNHF: $12.99B
CDAB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. RSNHF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $12.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDAB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRSNHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CDAB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RSNHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RSNHF is a better buy in the long-term than CDAB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDAB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSNHF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDAB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • RSNHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CDAB is a better buy in the short-term than RSNHF.

Price Growth

CDAB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.36% price change this week, while RSNHF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSNHF YTD gains are higher at: 17.396 vs. CDAB (8.739).
CDABRSNHFCDAB / RSNHF
CapitalizationN/A13B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.73917.39650%
P/E RatioN/A11.16-
RevenueN/A761B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A6.24T-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDAB vs RSNHF: Fundamental Ratings
CDAB
RSNHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10028
SMR RATING
1..100
1001
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5144
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1174
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RSNHF's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as CDAB (85). This means that RSNHF’s stock grew similarly to CDAB’s over the last 12 months.

RSNHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CDAB (100). This means that RSNHF’s stock grew significantly faster than CDAB’s over the last 12 months.

RSNHF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CDAB (100). This means that RSNHF’s stock grew significantly faster than CDAB’s over the last 12 months.

RSNHF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CDAB (51). This means that RSNHF’s stock grew similarly to CDAB’s over the last 12 months.

CDAB's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RSNHF (74). This means that CDAB’s stock grew somewhat faster than RSNHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDABRSNHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSNHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UHAL62.050.42
+0.68%
U-Haul Holding Company
CPAC6.15N/A
N/A
Cementos Pacasmayo SAA
TNC81.98-0.33
-0.40%
Tennant Company
BOWN10.10-0.10
-0.98%
Bowen Acquisition Corp
SSY0.87-0.04
-4.43%
SunLink Health Systems

CDAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDAB has been loosely correlated with CMHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDAB jumps, then CMHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDAB
1D Price
Change %
CDAB100%
+0.36%
CMHF - CDAB
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WTBFA - CDAB
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSNHF - CDAB
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WFCL - CDAB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNCDY - CDAB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RSNHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSNHF and CDAB have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSNHF and CDAB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSNHF
1D Price
Change %
RSNHF100%
N/A
CDAB - RSNHF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
BNCDY - RSNHF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBNNF - RSNHF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTPOF - RSNHF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INFT - RSNHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
More