CCYY
Price
$5.70
Change
-$0.30 (-5.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
EMYB
Price
$16.14
Change
-$0.03 (-0.19%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
114.56M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCYY vs EMYB

Header iconCCYY vs EMYB Comparison
Open Charts CCYY vs EMYBBanner chart's image
CCCB BAN
Price$5.70
Change-$0.30 (-5.00%)
Volume$2.69K
CapitalizationN/A
Embassy Ban
Price$16.14
Change-$0.03 (-0.19%)
Volume$2.31K
Capitalization114.56M
CCYY vs EMYB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EMYB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCYY vs. EMYB commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCYY is a Hold and EMYB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CCYY: $5.70 vs. EMYB: $16.14)
Brand notoriety: CCYY and EMYB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCYY: 45% vs. EMYB: 41%
Market capitalization -- CCYY: $0 vs. EMYB: $114.56M
CCYY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. EMYB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $114.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCYY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEMYB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCYY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EMYB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMYB is a better buy in the long-term than CCYY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCYY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EMYB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCYY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EMYB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CCYY and EMYB are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CCYY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.88% price change this week, while EMYB (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMYB YTD gains are higher at: 0.139 vs. CCYY (-0.870).
CCYYEMYBCCYY / EMYB
CapitalizationN/A115M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.8700.139-624%
P/E RatioN/A6.62-
RevenueN/A48.5M-
Total CashN/A22.9M-
Total DebtN/A14.7M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCYY vs EMYB: Fundamental Ratings
CCYY
EMYB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10057
SMR RATING
1..100
10050
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5549
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
224
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMYB's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as CCYY (59). This means that EMYB’s stock grew similarly to CCYY’s over the last 12 months.

EMYB's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCYY (100). This means that EMYB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCYY’s over the last 12 months.

EMYB's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCYY (100). This means that EMYB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCYY’s over the last 12 months.

EMYB's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as CCYY (55). This means that EMYB’s stock grew similarly to CCYY’s over the last 12 months.

CCYY's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as EMYB (24). This means that CCYY’s stock grew similarly to EMYB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCYYEMYB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
25%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
44%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
29%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EMYB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LKEQX38.870.35
+0.91%
LKCM Equity
PWJAX34.100.08
+0.24%
PGIM Jennison International Opps A
VESGX48.290.08
+0.17%
Vanguard Global ESG Select Stk Admiral
AFCHX17.23-0.04
-0.23%
American Century Focused Intl Gr C
RYVIX195.15-1.00
-0.51%
Rydex Energy Services Inv

CCYY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCYY and TCBS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCYY and TCBS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCYY
1D Price
Change %
CCYY100%
N/A
TCBS - CCYY
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
EMYB - CCYY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCNB - CCYY
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
CBWA - CCYY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCFN - CCYY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

EMYB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMYB and MCHT have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMYB and MCHT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMYB
1D Price
Change %
EMYB100%
N/A
MCHT - EMYB
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSRL - EMYB
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
CCYY - EMYB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HTBK - EMYB
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
CIVB - EMYB
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
More