CCYY
Price
$7.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 10 closing price
Capitalization
12.16M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EMYB
Price
$18.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
138.85M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCYY vs EMYB

Header iconCCYY vs EMYB Comparison
Open Charts CCYY vs EMYBBanner chart's image
CCCB BAN
Price$7.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization12.16M
Embassy Ban
Price$18.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$243
Capitalization138.85M
CCYY vs EMYB Comparison Chart in %
CCYY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EMYB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCYY vs. EMYB commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCYY is a Hold and EMYB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (CCYY: $7.30 vs. EMYB: $18.16)
Brand notoriety: CCYY and EMYB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCYY: 38% vs. EMYB: 5%
Market capitalization -- CCYY: $12.16M vs. EMYB: $138.85M
CCYY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $12.16M. EMYB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $138.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCYY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEMYB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CCYY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EMYB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMYB is a better buy in the long-term than CCYY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCYY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EMYB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCYY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EMYB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EMYB is a better buy in the short-term than CCYY.

Price Growth

CCYY (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while EMYB (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.05% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMYB($139M) has a higher market cap than CCYY($12.2M). CCYY has higher P/E ratio than EMYB: CCYY (73.00) vs EMYB (10.87). CCYY YTD gains are higher at: 29.658 vs. EMYB (12.696). EMYB has higher revenues than CCYY: EMYB (41.8M) vs CCYY (7.01M).
CCYYEMYBCCYY / EMYB
Capitalization12.2M139M9%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD29.65812.696234%
P/E Ratio73.0010.87671%
Revenue7.01M41.8M17%
Total CashN/A23.9M-
Total DebtN/A0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCYY vs EMYB: Fundamental Ratings
CCYY
EMYB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9412
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7550
SMR RATING
1..100
8954
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4448
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
155
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMYB's Valuation (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCYY (95). This means that EMYB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCYY’s over the last 12 months.

EMYB's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as CCYY (75). This means that EMYB’s stock grew similarly to CCYY’s over the last 12 months.

EMYB's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCYY (89). This means that EMYB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCYY’s over the last 12 months.

CCYY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as EMYB (48). This means that CCYY’s stock grew similarly to EMYB’s over the last 12 months.

CCYY's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMYB (55). This means that CCYY’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMYB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCYYEMYB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCYY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EMYB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBOXF0.700.06
+10.06%
D-Box Technologies, Inc.
ERMAY5.80N/A
N/A
Eramet-SLN
SHNWF5.50N/A
N/A
Schroders Plc.
BBUZ0.02N/A
-3.71%
Bebuzee Inc.
SNPMF0.53-0.02
-3.90%
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.

CCYY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCYY and PCLB have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCYY and PCLB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCYY
1D Price
Change %
CCYY100%
N/A
PCLB - CCYY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBN - CCYY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBKM - CCYY
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCBC - CCYY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CEFC - CCYY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

EMYB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMYB and SQCF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMYB and SQCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMYB
1D Price
Change %
EMYB100%
N/A
SQCF - EMYB
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLRK - EMYB
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
FSRL - EMYB
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.68%
STBI - EMYB
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
HTBK - EMYB
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
More