Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCWSX vs RERGX
CCWSX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts CCWSX vs RERGX
Baird Chautauqua International Gr I
Price$21.25
Change+$0.14 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.41B
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$59.48
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.56B
CCWSX vs RERGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCWSX vs. RERGX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCWSX is a Buy and RERGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. CCWSX (1.41B). RERGX pays higher dividends than CCWSX: RERGX (1.37) vs CCWSX (0.40). CCWSX was incepted earlier than RERGX: CCWSX (9 years) vs RERGX (16 years). CCWSX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). RERGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. CCWSX (18.00). RERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCWSX: RERGX (250) vs CCWSX (2500). CCWSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.27 vs. RERGX (3.95). CCWSX return over 5 years is better than : 66.28 vs. RERGX (20.61).
| CCWSX | RERGX | CCWSX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.47 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.47 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.587 | 10.015 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.41B | 133B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 1.37 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.27 | 3.95 | 438% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.90 | 26.91 | 197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.28 | 20.61 | 322% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 23.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement