Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCWSX vs RERGX
CCWSX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts CCWSX vs RERGX
Baird Chautauqua International Gr I
Price$22.06
Change-$0.22 (-0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.51B
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$63.85
Change-$0.52 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.46B
CCWSX vs RERGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCWSX vs. RERGX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCWSX is a Hold and RERGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. CCWSX (1.51B). RERGX pays higher dividends than CCWSX: RERGX (0.93) vs CCWSX (0.39). CCWSX was incepted earlier than RERGX: CCWSX (9 years) vs RERGX (16 years). CCWSX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). RERGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. CCWSX (18.00). RERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCWSX: RERGX (250) vs CCWSX (2500). CCWSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.29 vs. RERGX (5.75). CCWSX return over 5 years is better than : 55.78 vs. RERGX (17.78).
| CCWSX | RERGX | CCWSX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.47 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.47 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.827 | 18.857 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.51B | 136B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.93 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.29 | 5.75 | 266% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.28 | 51.77 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.78 | 17.78 | 314% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 52.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement