Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCWSX vs RERGX
CCWSX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts CCWSX vs RERGX
Baird Chautauqua International Gr I
Price$21.53
Change+$0.17 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46B
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$62.55
Change+$0.36 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.22B
CCWSX vs RERGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCWSX vs. RERGX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCWSX is a StrongBuy and RERGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. CCWSX (1.46B). RERGX pays higher dividends than CCWSX: RERGX (0.96) vs CCWSX (0.40). CCWSX was incepted earlier than RERGX: CCWSX (9 years) vs RERGX (16 years). CCWSX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). RERGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. CCWSX (18.00). RERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCWSX: RERGX (250) vs CCWSX (2500). CCWSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.83 vs. RERGX (8.63). CCWSX return over 5 years is better than : 54.26 vs. RERGX (14.33).
| CCWSX | RERGX | CCWSX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.47 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.47 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.827 | 16.437 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 135B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.96 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.83 | 8.63 | 195% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.73 | 25.74 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.26 | 14.33 | 379% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 34.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement