Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCWRX vs RGAGX
CCWRX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts CCWRX vs RGAGX
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst3
Price$9.85
Change+$0.12 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets723.91M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$83.01
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
CCWRX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCWRX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCWRX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. CCWRX (724M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than CCWRX: RGAGX (0.61) vs CCWRX (0.00). CCWRX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: CCWRX (13 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). CCWRX (0.78) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). CCWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCWRX: RGAGX (250) vs CCWRX (1000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.27 vs. CCWRX (-10.29). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 51.38 vs. CCWRX (-32.90).
| CCWRX | RGAGX | CCWRX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.30 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.30 | 260% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.163 | 11.348 | -63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 724M | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.61 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.29 | 11.27 | -91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.46 | 60.98 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.90 | 51.38 | -64% |
| Returns for 10 years | -47.80 | 89.12 | -54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement