Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCWRX vs RGAGX
CCWRX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts CCWRX vs RGAGX
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst3
Price$9.73
Change+$0.09 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets666.98M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.97
Change+$0.48 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
CCWRX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCWRX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCWRX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. CCWRX (667M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than CCWRX: RGAGX (0.59) vs CCWRX (0.00). CCWRX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: CCWRX (13 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). CCWRX (0.78) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). CCWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCWRX: RGAGX (250) vs CCWRX (1000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.13 vs. CCWRX (-3.57). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 46.68 vs. CCWRX (-40.01).
| CCWRX | RGAGX | CCWRX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.30 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.30 | 260% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.294 | 16.660 | -50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 667M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.59 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.57 | 22.13 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.11 | 54.30 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -40.01 | 46.68 | -86% |
| Returns for 10 years | -45.82 | 103.98 | -44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement