Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCWRX vs RGAGX
CCWRX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts CCWRX vs RGAGX
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst3
Price$9.76
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets683.93M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$85.36
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
CCWRX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCWRX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCWRX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. CCWRX (684M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than CCWRX: RGAGX (0.60) vs CCWRX (0.00). CCWRX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: CCWRX (13 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). CCWRX (0.78) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). CCWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCWRX: RGAGX (250) vs CCWRX (1000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.11 vs. CCWRX (-7.05). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 46.14 vs. CCWRX (-37.72).
| CCWRX | RGAGX | CCWRX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.30 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.30 | 260% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.011 | 14.500 | -55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 684M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.60 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.05 | 15.11 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.52 | 43.78 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.72 | 46.14 | -82% |
| Returns for 10 years | -49.19 | 90.14 | -55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement