Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCWRX vs RGAGX
CCWRX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts CCWRX vs RGAGX
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst3
Price$10.01
Change+$0.05 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets713.88M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$84.62
Change+$0.29 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
CCWRX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCWRX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCWRX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. CCWRX (714M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than CCWRX: RGAGX (0.61) vs CCWRX (0.00). CCWRX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: CCWRX (13 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). CCWRX (0.78) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). CCWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCWRX: RGAGX (250) vs CCWRX (1000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.20 vs. CCWRX (-1.48). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 50.83 vs. CCWRX (-33.53).
| CCWRX | RGAGX | CCWRX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.30 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.30 | 260% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.655 | 13.508 | -42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 714M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.61 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.48 | 18.20 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.31 | 59.73 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.53 | 50.83 | -66% |
| Returns for 10 years | -48.40 | 89.40 | -54% |