Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCWRX vs GFACX
CCWRX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CCWRX vs GFACX
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst3
Price$10.22
Change-$0.21 (-2.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets665.47M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.18
Change-$1.66 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
CCWRX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCWRX vs. GFACX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCWRX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. CCWRX (665M). CCWRX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCWRX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CCWRX (13 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than CCWRX (0.78). CCWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCWRX: GFACX (250) vs CCWRX (1000000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.76 vs. CCWRX (-11.61). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.74 vs. CCWRX (-41.21).
| CCWRX | GFACX | CCWRX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.36 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.36 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.697 | 18.946 | -9% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 665M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.61 | 6.76 | -172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.14 | 57.80 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -41.21 | 30.74 | -134% |
| Returns for 10 years | -42.82 | 82.09 | -52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement