Advertisement
CCUR vs FNTTF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCUR is a Hold and FNTTF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCUR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFNTTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CCUR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FNTTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCUR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNTTF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCUR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
- FNTTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
CCUR (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а +28.87% price change this week, while FNTTF (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was +1.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.92%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Processing Hardware (+1.75% weekly)Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.
| CCUR | FNTTF | CCUR / FNTTF | |
| Capitalization | 9.12M | 4.26M | 214% |
| EBITDA | N/A | -3.05M | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.111 | 122.145 | 9% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 697K | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 6.91K | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 5.67M | - |
CCUR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CCUR | FNTTF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 38% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 17% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 36% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 18% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 12% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 63% |
Advertisement
CCUR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CCUR and RGTI have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCUR and RGTI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCUR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCUR | 100% | N/A | ||
| RGTI - CCUR | 3% Poorly correlated | -1.40% | ||
| IONQ - CCUR | -1% Poorly correlated | +3.36% | ||
| QBTS - CCUR | -1% Poorly correlated | -1.57% | ||
| FNTTF - CCUR | -3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CRCT - CCUR | -3% Poorly correlated | -0.18% |
FNTTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FNTTF and RGTI have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNTTF and RGTI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNTTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNTTF | 100% | N/A | ||
| RGTI - FNTTF | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.40% | ||
| CRCT - FNTTF | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.18% | ||
| IONQ - FNTTF | 1% Poorly correlated | +3.36% | ||
| QBTS - FNTTF | 0% Poorly correlated | -1.57% | ||
| CCUR - FNTTF | -3% Poorly correlated | N/A |