CCTG
Price
$0.64
Change
-$0.06 (-8.57%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.76M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HUBB
Price
$486.89
Change
-$16.97 (-3.37%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
26.78B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCTG vs HUBB

Header iconCCTG vs HUBB Comparison
Open Charts CCTG vs HUBBBanner chart's image
CCSC Technology International Holdings
Price$0.64
Change-$0.06 (-8.57%)
Volume$200
Capitalization2.76M
Hubbell
Price$486.89
Change-$16.97 (-3.37%)
Volume$6.85K
Capitalization26.78B
CCTG vs HUBB Comparison Chart in %
CCTG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HUBB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCTG vs. HUBB commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCTG is a Hold and HUBB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (CCTG: $0.70 vs. HUBB: $503.86)
Brand notoriety: CCTG and HUBB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electrical Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCTG: 9% vs. HUBB: 217%
Market capitalization -- CCTG: $2.76M vs. HUBB: $26.78B
CCTG [@Electrical Products] is valued at $2.76M. HUBB’s [@Electrical Products] market capitalization is $26.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electrical Products] industry ranges from $230.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electrical Products] industry is $11.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCTG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CCTG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HUBB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HUBB is a better buy in the long-term than CCTG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCTG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCTG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HUBB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CCTG and HUBB are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CCTG (@Electrical Products) experienced а -21.59% price change this week, while HUBB (@Electrical Products) price change was +4.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was -0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

HUBB is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electrical Products (-0.39% weekly)

The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUBB($26.8B) has a higher market cap than CCTG($2.76M). HUBB YTD gains are higher at: 13.454 vs. CCTG (-54.075). HUBB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.34B vs. CCTG (-1.25M). HUBB has more cash in the bank: 681M vs. CCTG (2.82M). CCTG has less debt than HUBB: CCTG (1.14M) vs HUBB (2.15B). HUBB has higher revenues than CCTG: HUBB (5.69B) vs CCTG (16.9M).
CCTGHUBBCCTG / HUBB
Capitalization2.76M26.8B0%
EBITDA-1.25M1.34B-0%
Gain YTD-54.07513.454-402%
P/E RatioN/A30.46-
Revenue16.9M5.69B0%
Total Cash2.82M681M0%
Total Debt1.14M2.15B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUBB: Fundamental Ratings
HUBB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
23
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20
SMR RATING
1..100
38
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
22
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCTGHUBB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCTG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HUBB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VIDI37.030.29
+0.79%
Vident International Equity Strategy ETF
YMAR27.470.02
+0.07%
FT Vest Intl Eq Mod Bffr ETF Mar
SPYA27.99N/A
N/A
Twin Oak Endure ETF
IMCG82.03-0.62
-0.75%
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
TINY63.12-0.55
-0.87%
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF

CCTG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCTG and ENVX have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCTG and ENVX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCTG
1D Price
Change %
CCTG100%
-2.32%
ENVX - CCTG
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.53%
AEIS - CCTG
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
VRT - CCTG
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
HUBB - CCTG
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
NVT - CCTG
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.14%
More

HUBB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBB has been closely correlated with NVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBB jumps, then NVT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBB
1D Price
Change %
HUBB100%
+1.67%
NVT - HUBB
73%
Closely correlated
+3.14%
VRT - HUBB
67%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
AYI - HUBB
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
POWL - HUBB
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.92%
AEIS - HUBB
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
More